Felarca et al v. Birgeneau et al
Filing
388
DISREGARD ENTRY. ORDER DOCKETED IN INCORRECT CASE NUMBER ORDER STAYING DEADLINES, SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING. The 5/11/15 CMC date is vacated. A Compliance Hearing is set for Friday, 6/19/2015 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/28/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2015) Modified on 4/28/2015 (fs, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MAP TOOL INC.,
Case No. 15-cv-00279-YGR
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER STAYING DEADLINES, SETTING
COMPLIANCE HEARING
9
10
SUPERSONIC, INC.,
Re: Dkt. No. 21
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
The Court understands, based on the representation of the parties, that the above-captioned
13
case has settled. (Dkt. No. 21.) Pursuant to stipulation, the Court hereby STAYS all current
14
deadlines through June 11, 2015. The case management conference set for May 11, 2015 is
15
therefore VACATED. Additionally, a compliance hearing regarding the status of the process of
16
finalizing the settlement shall be held on the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar on Friday, June 19, 2015,
17
in Courtroom 1 of the United States Courthouse located at 1301 Clay Street in Oakland,
18
California.
19
Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file
20
either (1) a notice of finalized settlement agreement and stipulation of dismissal; or (2) a one-page
21
joint statement setting forth an explanation regarding the failure to comply. If compliance is
22
complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar.
23
This Order terminates Docket Number 21.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: April 2
2015
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?