Felarca et al v. Birgeneau et al
Filing
430
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 427 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
YVETTE FELARCA, ET AL.,
Case No. 11-cv-05719-YGR
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
ROBERT J. BIRGENEAU, ET AL.,
Defendants.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
EXTEND TIME TO REPLY RE: PLAINTIFFS’
SECOND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
Dkt. No. 427
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Plaintiffs have filed a Motion to Extend Time to Reply Re: Plaintiffs’ Second Motion for
13
Leave To Amend the Third Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 427.) Plaintiffs’ Reply was due on
14
May 27, 2015. The motion for an extension was filed on June 2, 2015. To date, no reply has been
15
filed on Plaintiffs’ motion.
16
Plaintiffs have requested extensions of, or failed to comply with, numerous deadlines set
17
by this Court. The Court has been more than lenient in granting extensions and in considering late
18
filings by Plaintiffs. In the instant request for additional time to reply on a motion they elected to
19
file at the eleventh hour, Plaintiffs have failed to show good cause for an extension.
20
21
The request for extension of time is, therefore, DENIED. The Court will not consider any
reply on the Second Motion for Leave To Amend the Third Amended Complaint.
22
This order terminates Dkt. No. 427.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED. This order terminates Dkt. No. 427.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 5, 2015
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?