Felarca et al v. Birgeneau et al

Filing 430

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 427 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 YVETTE FELARCA, ET AL., Case No. 11-cv-05719-YGR Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 ROBERT J. BIRGENEAU, ET AL., Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO REPLY RE: PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Dkt. No. 427 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Plaintiffs have filed a Motion to Extend Time to Reply Re: Plaintiffs’ Second Motion for 13 Leave To Amend the Third Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 427.) Plaintiffs’ Reply was due on 14 May 27, 2015. The motion for an extension was filed on June 2, 2015. To date, no reply has been 15 filed on Plaintiffs’ motion. 16 Plaintiffs have requested extensions of, or failed to comply with, numerous deadlines set 17 by this Court. The Court has been more than lenient in granting extensions and in considering late 18 filings by Plaintiffs. In the instant request for additional time to reply on a motion they elected to 19 file at the eleventh hour, Plaintiffs have failed to show good cause for an extension. 20 21 The request for extension of time is, therefore, DENIED. The Court will not consider any reply on the Second Motion for Leave To Amend the Third Amended Complaint. 22 This order terminates Dkt. No. 427. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. This order terminates Dkt. No. 427. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 5, 2015 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?