Rasheed v Gipson
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE;AND ADDRESSING PETITIONER'S PENDING MOTION. Habeas Answer due by 3/29/2013. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/28/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2013)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND
ADDRESSING PETITIONER'S PENDING
MOTION
Petitioner,
vs.
J. SOTO, Acting Warden,
8
Respondent.
9
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 11-05767 YGR (PR)
J. SMITH, aka TAHEE RASHEED,
/
Petitioner, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at California State Prison - Los Angeles
11
County (LAC), has filed the present action. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis
12
(IFP).
13
In an Order dated October 23, 2012, the Court determined that Petitioner was seeking federal
14
habeas relief from his state convictions. However, Petitioner did not use this Court's habeas petition
15
form. The Court found that the petition he had submitted was not comprehensible. Therefore, the
16
petition was dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner was instructed to filed an amended petition
17
using the proper form within thirty days.
18
On November 19, 2012, Petitioner filed an amended petition.
19
On November 29, 2012, Petitioner filed a motion entitled, "Request of Extension of Time to
20
File the Injunction," in which he complains that LAC prison officials have denied him his "legal
21
property, canteen, mailouts, access to the law library, [and] access to legal materials." (Nov. 29,
22
2012 Mot. at 1.)
23
24
25
It does not appear from the face of the amended petition that it is without merit. Good cause
appearing, the Court hereby issues the following orders:
1.
The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order and the amended petition and
26
all attachments thereto upon Respondent and Respondent's attorney, the Attorney General of the
27
State of California. The Clerk shall also serve a copy of this Order on Petitioner at his current
28
address.
1
2.
Respondent shall file with this Court and serve upon Petitioner, within sixty-three
2
(63) days of the issuance of this Order, an Answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules
3
Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued.
4
Respondent shall file with the Answer a copy of all portions of the relevant state records that have
5
been transcribed previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the
6
petition.
7
3.
If Petitioner wishes to respond to the Answer, he shall do so by filing a Traverse with
8
the Court and serving it on Respondent within sixty-three (63) days of his receipt of the Answer.
9
Should Petitioner fail to do so, the petition will be deemed submitted and ready for decision sixty-
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
three (63) days after the date Petitioner is served with Respondent's Answer.
4.
Respondent may file with this Court and serve upon Petitioner, within sixty-three
12
(63) days of the issuance of this Order, a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an
13
Answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section
14
2254 Cases. If Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on
15
Respondent an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion within sixty-three (63) days
16
of receipt of the motion, and Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner a reply
17
within fourteen (14) days of receipt of any opposition.
18
5.
It is Petitioner's responsibility to prosecute this case. Petitioner must keep the Court
19
and Respondent informed of any change of address and must comply with the Court's orders in a
20
timely fashion. Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11 a party proceeding pro se whose
21
address changes while an action is pending must promptly file a notice of change of address
22
specifying the new address. See L.R. 3-11(a). The Court may dismiss without prejudice a complaint
23
when: (1) mail directed to the pro se party by the Court has been returned to the Court as not
24
deliverable, and (2) the Court fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written
25
communication from the pro se party indicating a current address. See L.R. 3-11(b); see also
26
Martinez v. Johnson, 104 F.3d 769, 772 (5th Cir. 1997) (Rule 41(b) applicable in habeas cases).
27
28
Petitioner must also serve on Respondent's counsel all communications with the Court by
mailing a true copy of the document to Respondent's counsel.
2
1
6.
Extensions of time are not favored, though reasonable extensions will be granted.
2
Any motion for an extension of time must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the
3
deadline sought to be extended.
4
5
6
7.
J. Soto, the current acting warden of the prison where Petitioner is incarcerated, has
been substituted as Respondent pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
8.
Petitioner has filed a "Request of Extension of Time to File the Injunction" (Docket
7
No. 13), in which he challenges the conditions of his confinement at LAC. A federal habeas petition
8
is not the proper way to raise such claims. See Badea v. Cox, 931 F.2d 573, 574 (9th Cir. 1991)
9
(civil rights action proper method of challenging conditions of confinement). Accordingly,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Petitioner's motion is DENIED. His claims attacking the conditions of his confinement are more
11
appropriately addressed in a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. Therefore, if
12
Petitioner wishes to pursue such claims, he may do so by filing a new civil rights action
13
accompanied by the requisite filing fee or an IFP application in the correct venue. Because LAC is
14
located in Lancaster, California, which lies within the venue of the Central District of California,
15
and Petitioner seeks immediate injunctive relief and damages from LAC prison officials for various
16
conditions of his current confinement, it is in the interests of justice and convenience of the parties
17
for these claims to be pursued in the Western Division of the United States District Court for the
18
Central District of California. Therefore, Petitioner may file a civil rights action in that venue if he
19
wishes to pursue such claims.
20
9.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
This Order terminates Docket No. 13.
DATED: January 28, 2013
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\YGR\HC.11\Rasheed767.OSC.frm
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?