Center for Biological Diversity, Greenpeace, Inc et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
Filing
46
ORDER by Judge GONZALEZ ROGERS granting 42 Motion to Approve Consent Judgment (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)
Case4:11-cv-06059-YGR Document40-1 Filed08/27/12 Page1 of 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
VERA P. PARDEE (State Bar No. 106146)
Center for Biological Diversity
351 California Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415.436.9682 ext. 317
Facsimile: 415.436.9683
Email: vpardee@biologicaldiversity.org
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
HELEN H. KANG (State Bar No. 124730)
Environmental Law and Justice Clinic
Golden Gate University School of Law
536 Mission Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415.442.6647
Facsimile: 415.896.2450
Email: hkang@ggu.edu
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
15
GREENPEACE, INC. and
PORT TOWNSEND AIRWATCHERS
16
[Counsel for Defendants listed on page 2]
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, ) Case No.: C-11-06059 YGR
)
GREENPEACE, INC., and PORT
)
TOWNSEND AIRWATCHERS,
)
) [PROPOSED] CONSENT DECREE
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL
)
)
PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA P.
)
JACKSON, Administrator, United States
)
Environmental Protection Agency,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case4:11-cv-06059-YGR Document40-1 Filed08/27/12 Page2 of 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IGNACIA S. MORENO
Assistant Attorney General
Environment & Natural Resources Division
NORMAN L. RAVE, JR. (D.C. 431602)
Environmental Defense Section
Environment & Natural Resources Division
United States Department of Justice
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: 202.616.7568
Facsimile: 202.514.8865
Email: norman.rave@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
10
CONSENT DECREE
11
12
13
14
15
16
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity, Greenpeace, Inc., and Port
Townsend Airwatchers (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed their Complaint on December 6,
2011, against Defendants the United States Environmental Protection Agency and EPA
Administrator Lisa Jackson (collectively “EPA”), pursuant to section 304(a)(2) of the Clean Air
17
Act ("CAA"), 42 U.S.C. § 7604(a)(2), to compel EPA to review the existing New Source
18
Performance Standards governing kraft pulp mills (“kraft pulp NSPS”) under Clean Air Act
19
(“the Act”) Section 111, 42 U.S.C. § 7411;
20
21
22
WHEREAS, EPA last issued kraft pulp NSPS, set forth in 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart
BB (“NSPS”), in 1978;
23
WHEREAS, plaintiffs allege that EPA has failed to perform a non-discretionary
24
duty to review, and if appropriate revise, the NSPS for kraft pulp mills at least every 8
25
years pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 7411 (b)(1)(B);
26
27
28
WHEREAS, EPA will be providing Plaintiffs with status reports every 90 days to inform
Plaintiffs whether the Agency continues to make reasonable progress towards meeting the
Case4:11-cv-06059-YGR Document40-1 Filed08/27/12 Page3 of 9
1
deadlines provided in this consent decree, or if it anticipates any difficulties in meeting those
2
dates, in which case the EPA will provide an explanation of the difficulty or difficulties;
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and EPA (collectively "the Parties") wish to effectuate a
settlement of the above-captioned matter without expensive and protracted litigation;
WHEREAS, the Parties consider this Decree to be an adequate and equitable resolution
of the claims in the above-captioned matter; and
WHEREAS, the Court, by entering this Decree, finds that the Decree represents a fair,
equitable, and adequate resolution of the claims resolved herein; NOW THEREFORE, it is
hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
1.
This Court has jurisdiction over the claims set forth in the Complaint, and to order
the relief contained in this Decree, pursuant to section 304 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604. Venue
is proper in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California pursuant to
section 304 of the Act, 42 § U.S.C. 7604, and 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e).
17
2.
For the kraft pulp mills source category:
18
a.
No later than May 15, 2013, EPA shall: (i) review the kraft pulp NSPS and sign
19
20
21
22
for publication one or a combination of the following: (A) a proposed rule
containing revisions to the kraft pulp NSPS, 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart BB
(“NSPS Subpart BB”), under section 111(b)(1)(B) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §
23
7411(b)(1)(B); or (B) a proposed determination under section 111(b)(1)(B) not to
24
revise NSPS Subpart BB; or (ii) sign for publication a determination that “review
25
is not appropriate in light of readily available information on the efficacy of [the]
26
27
28
standard,” i.e., NSPS Subpart BB.
Case4:11-cv-06059-YGR Document40-1 Filed08/27/12 Page4 of 9
1
b.
2
2.a(i) above, then no later than March 14, 2014, EPA shall sign one or a
3
combination of the following:
4
(i) a final rule containing revisions to NSPS
Subpart BB under section 111(b)(1)(B) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7411(b)(1)(B); or
5
(ii) a final determination under section 111(b)(1)(B) not to revise Subpart BB.
6
7
If EPA signs a proposed rule or a proposed determination pursuant to paragraph
c.
8
The Parties do not agree on the legal question of whether notice and comment is
required in the event that EPA takes action only pursuant to paragraph 2.a(ii). In
9
view of this, the Parties agree that nothing in this Consent Decree precludes
10
Plaintiffs from challenging any such action on the basis that notice and comment
11
12
was not provided, or on any other grounds, or as stated generally in Paragraph 9;
13
and nothing prevents EPA from raising any defenses in response to such a
14
15
16
challenge.
3.
Within 10 business days of signing any of the documents described in Paragraph
17
2, the appropriate EPA official shall forward it or them to the Office of the Federal Register for
18
publication. EPA shall request in writing that the Office of Federal Register take all necessary
19
steps to publish the notice expeditiously.
20
21
22
23
4.
Within five (5) business days after forwarding the materials described in
Paragraph 2 to the Federal Register, EPA shall send copies of such materials to Plaintiffs.
5.
The deadlines set forth in Paragraphs 2 and 3 hereof may be modified only by:
24
(a) written stipulation of the Parties with notice to the Court; or (b) the Court following motion
25
of any party to this Decree, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and upon
26
27
28
consideration of any response by the non-moving party.
6.
Pursuant to section 304(d) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604(d), Plaintiffs
Case4:11-cv-06059-YGR Document40-1 Filed08/27/12 Page5 of 9
1
are eligible and entitled to recover their costs of litigation in this action, including reasonable
2
attorney’s fees. The deadline for filing a bill of costs pursuant to Local Rule 54-1 and a motion
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
for costs of litigation, including reasonable attorney’s fees pursuant to Local Rule 54-5, is
extended until 90 days after the date on which the Court enters this Consent Decree. EPA
reserves the right to object to the reasonableness of any such fees and costs.
7.
The Parties shall not challenge the terms of this Decree or this Court's jurisdiction
to enter and enforce this Decree. Upon entry, no party shall challenge the terms of this Decree.
8.
Except as provided herein, nothing in this Decree shall be construed to limit or
modify any discretion accorded to EPA by the CAA or by general principles of administrative
law in taking the actions that are the subject of this Decree.
9.
Nothing in this Decree shall be construed to confer upon this Court jurisdiction to
review any issues that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States Courts of
Appeals pursuant to CAA Section 307(b)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1). Nothing in the terms of
17
this Decree shall be construed to waive, limit or modify any remedies, rights to seek judicial
18
review, or defenses the Parties may have under CAA Section 307(b)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1).
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10.
The obligations imposed on EPA under this Decree can only be undertaken using
appropriated funds. No provision of this Decree shall be interpreted as or constitute a
commitment or requirement that EPA obligate or pay funds in contravention of the AntiDeficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. § 1341, or any other applicable federal statute.
11.
Any notices required or provided for by this Decree shall be made in writing, via
email or other means, and sent to the following:
Case4:11-cv-06059-YGR Document40-1 Filed08/27/12 Page6 of 9
1
2
For Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity:
6
Vera P. Pardee
Center for Biological Diversity
351 California Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415.436.9682 ext. 317
Facsimile: 415.436.9683
Email: vpardee@biologicaldiversity.org
7
For Plantiffs Greenpeace, Inc, and Port Townsend Airwatchers:
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Helen H. Kang
Environmental Law and Justice Clinic
Golden Gate University School of Law
536 Mission Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415.442.6647
Facsimile: 415.896.2450
Email: hkang@ggu.edu
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
GREENPEACE, INC. and
PORT TOWNSEND AIRWATCHERS
For EPA :
Norman L. Rave, Jr.
Environmental Defense Section
Environment & Natural Resources Division
United States Department of Justice
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: 202.616.7568
Facsimile: 202.514.8865
Email: norman.rave@usdoj.gov
Scott Jordan
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of General Counsel
ARN: MC-2344A
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Telephone: 202-564-7508
Fax: (202) 564-5603
Email: jordan.scott@epa.gov
Case4:11-cv-06059-YGR Document40-1 Filed08/27/12 Page7 of 9
1
2
3
4
5
12.
In the event of a dispute between the Parties concerning the interpretation or
implementation of any aspect of this Decree, the disputing party shall provide the other party
with a written notice outlining the nature of the dispute and requesting informal negotiations.
The parties shall meet and confer to attempt to resolve the dispute. If the Parties cannot reach an
6
agreed-upon resolution within ten (10) business days after receipt of the notice, any party may
7
move the Court to resolve the dispute.
8
9
10
11
13.
No motion or other proceeding seeking to enforce this Consent Decree or for
contempt of court shall be filed unless the procedure set forth in Paragraph 12 has been followed.
14.
The Parties agree and acknowledge that, before this Decree can be finalized and
12
entered by the Court, EPA must provide notice of this Decree in the Federal Register and an
13
opportunity for public comment pursuant to the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7413(g). EPA will
14
15
16
prepare such notice and forward it to the Office of Federal Register no later than ten (10)
business days after the parties have signed this Consent Decree and request in writing that the
17
Office of Federal Register take all necessary steps to publish the notice expeditiously. After this
18
Decree has undergone notice and comment, EPA and/or the Attorney General, as appropriate,
19
shall promptly consider any such written comments in determining whether to withdraw or
20
21
22
withhold their consent to the Decree. In accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 7413(g), EPA may
withdraw or withhold its consent to the decree if the comments disclose facts or considerations
23
which indicate such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the
24
requirements of the Clean Air Act. Once EPA and/or the Attorney General elect whether or not
25
to withdraw or withhold their consent to this Decree, EPA shall provide written notice of that
26
27
28
election to Plaintiffs as expeditiously as possible. If EPA and/or the Attorney General do not
Case4:11-cv-06059-YGR Document40-1 Filed08/27/12 Page8 of 9
1
elect to withdraw or withhold their consent, EPA shall promptly file a motion that requests that
2
the Court enter this Decree.
3
4
5
15.
The Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine and effectuate compliance with
this Decree. When EPA’s obligations under Paragraph 2 and 3 have been completed, and the
6
Plaintiffs’ claims for costs of litigation have been resolved pursuant to the process described in
7
Paragraph 6, the above-captioned matter shall be dismissed with prejudice. EPA shall file the
8
appropriate notice with the Court so that the Clerk may close the file.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
16.
The Parties treat this Consent Decree as jointly drafted, and any rules of
construction that construe any ambiguities in this document against the drafting party shall be
inapplicable in any dispute concerning the interpretation of this Consent Decree.
17.
The undersigned representatives of each party certify that they are fully
authorized by the party or parties they represent to bind that Party to the terms of this Decree.
The Parties' Joint Motion to Enter Consent Decree is GRANTED.
17
This Order Terminates Docket Number 42.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: January 2, 2013
______________________ ________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Case4:11-cv-06059-YGR Document40-1 Filed08/27/12 Page9 of 9
1
FOR PLAINTIFFS:
2
Dated: August 27, 2012
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
3
/s/Vera Pardee
4
Vera Pardee
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Center for Biological Diversity
5
6
7
Dated: August 27, 2012
8
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND JUSTICE
CLINIC
9
10
/s/ Helen H. Kang
Helen H. Kang
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Greenpeace, Inc. and Port Townsend
Airwatchers
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FOR DEFENDANTS:
Dated: August 27, 2012
IGNACIA S. MORENO
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental & Natural Resources Division
/s/Norman L. Rave, Jr.
Norman L. Rave, Jr.
Environmental Defense Section
Environment & Natural Resources Division
United States Department of Justice
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, D.C. 20044
TEL: (202) 616-7568
FAX: (202) 514-8865
Attorneys for Defendants
United States Environmental Protection Agency and
Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator, United States
Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?