LML Holdings, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Distributing Inc. et al

Filing 109

CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/10/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

LML HOLDINGS, INC.,

5
6
7
8

Case No.: 11-CV-6173 YGR

Plaintiff(s),

CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER

vs.
PACIFIC COAST DISTRIBUTING INC. et al.,
Defendant(s).

9
10
11

A Case Management and Pre-Filing Conference was held in this action on April 5, 2013 at
which the Court set the following trial and pretrial dates:
PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE/STATUS RE
DISCOVERY:

Monday, 4/22/13 at 3:00pm

REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE RYU FOR A
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE TO BE COMPLETED BY:

8/30/13

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:

5/31/13

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS (RETAINED/NONRETAINED):

Opening: 7/15/13
Rebuttal: 8/5/13

EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:

8/30/13

BRIEFING FOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT:

Motion due:
4/16/13;
Opposition due: 5/14/13
5/28/13
Reply due:
Hearing Date: 6/25/13 at 2:00pm

24

COMPLIANCE HEARING (SEE PAGE 2)

Friday, 9/20/13 at 9:01 a.m.

25

JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT:

9/27/13

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE:

Friday, 10/11/13 at 9:00 a.m.

TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH:

Monday, 11/4/13 at 8:30 a.m. for 5 days
(Jury Trial)

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

26
27
28

1

Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall

2

meet and confer at least twenty-one (21) days in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance

3

hearing on Friday, September 20, 2013 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel have timely

4

met and conferred as required by the Pretrial Instructions. The compliance hearing shall be held in

5

the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in Courtroom 5. Five (5) business

6

days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file a one-page JOINT STATEMENT

7

confirming they have complied with this requirement or explaining their failure to comply. If

8

compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off

9

calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a

10

timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.

Northern District of California

The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing

12
United States District Court

11

Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All Standing

13

Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders.

14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 10, 2013
_______________________________________

16

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2