LML Holdings, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Distributing Inc. et al
Filing
139
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S FILING AN UNTIMELY BRIEF AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH PAGE LIMITATION. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 6/14/2013 09:01 AM. Show Cause Response due by 6/10/2013. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/5/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
LML HOLDINGS, INC.,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
Case No.: 11-CV-06173 YGR
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S FILING AN UNTIMELY BRIEF AND
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH PAGE LIMITATION
OF CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-4(b)
PACIFIC COAST DISTRIBUTING INC. et al.,
Defendant(s).
16
17
TO PLAINTIFF AND ITS COUNSEL OF RECORD:
18
Counsel for Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why counsel should not be
19
sanctioned and the Reply brief stricken for being untimely filed and for failing to comply with Civil
20
Local Rule 7-4(b) regarding page limitations.
21
The deadline for Plaintiff to file its Reply brief was May 28, 2013. (Dkt. No. 109.) Plaintiff
22
filed its Reply brief on May 29, 2013. (Dkt. No. 135.) Civil Local Rule 7-4(b) provides that, unless
23
the Court expressly orders otherwise, “the reply brief or memorandum may not exceed 15 pages of
24
text.” Plaintiff’s Reply brief was in excess of 15 pages of text.
25
A hearing on this Order to Show Cause shall be held on Friday, June 14, 2013, on the
26
Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in a
27
courtroom to be designated. By no later than 2:00 p.m. on Monday, June 10, 2013, Plaintiff’s
28
counsel must file a written response to this Order to Show Cause, if counsel contests it.
1
If the Court is satisfied with counsel’s response, it will consider taking the Order to Show
2
Cause hearing off calendar. Otherwise, personal appearance is required and neither a special
3
appearance nor telephonic appearance will be permitted. Failure to file a written response or to
4
appear personally will be deemed an admission that no good cause exists such that the imposition of
5
monetary sanctions is appropriate and that Plaintiff’s Reply brief should be stricken.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: June 5, 2013
____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?