Megaupload Ltd v. Universal Music Group Inc

Filing 27

ORDER Granting 19 Stipulation Extending Defendant's Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. Responses due by 1/24/2012. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/3/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP KELLY M. KLAUS (SBN 161091) Kelly.Klaus@mto.com 355 South Grand Avenue Thirty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 5 6 7 8 9 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP JONATHAN H. BLAVIN (SBN 230269) Jonathan.Blavin@mto.com 560 Mission Street Twenty-Seventh Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 ROTHKEN LAW FIRM IRA P. ROTHKEN (SBN 160029) JARED R. SMITH (SBN 130343) 3 Hamilton Landing, Suite 280 Novato, CA 94949 Telephone: (415) 924-4250 Facsimile: (415) 924-2905 Email: ira@techfirm.com Email: jared@techfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff MEGAUPLOAD LTD. 10 11 Attorneys for Defendant UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 OAKLAND DIVISION 15 16 MEGAUPLOAD LTD., CASE NO. C-11-6216 CW 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., [CIVIL L.R. 6-1(a), 6-2] 20 Defendant. 21 Judge: Honorable Claudia Wilken 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C-11-6216 CW 1 2 WHEREAS Plaintiff Megaupload Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) served the Complaint in this matter on Universal Music Group, Inc. (“Defendant”) on December 13, 2011; 3 WHEREAS under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A)(i), the deadline for 4 Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint would otherwise be January 3, 2012; 5 WHEREAS, given the holiday season, Defendant has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed, 6 that Defendant may have an additional twenty-one (21) days to answer or otherwise respond to 7 the Complaint; 8 WHEREAS Plaintiff has requested, and Defendant has agreed, that if Defendant chooses 9 to file a motion after having 42 days to prepare it, Plaintiff may have no less than 21 days after in 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 which to prepare its Opposition thereto; WHEREAS there have been no prior time modifications in the case, and the extension stipulated to herein will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court Order; THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a) and 6-2, Plaintiff and Defendant STIPULATE as follows: Defendant shall have through and including January 24, 2012 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. In the event that Plaintiff files a motion or other pleading than an answer, Plaintiff shall have through and including February 14, 2012 to file its opposition thereto. Nothing in this stipulation precludes the parties, should they mutually agree to do so, from 20 entering and submitting to the Court a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order with a different briefing 21 schedule for both opposition and reply briefing. 22 SO STIPULATED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- JOINT STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. C-11-6216 CW 1 DATED: December 23, 2011 2 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP By: /s/ Kelly M. Klaus Kelly M. Klaus 3 Attorneys for Defendant UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC. 4 5 6 DATED: December 23, 2011 ROTHKEN LAW FIRM By: /s/ Ira P. Rothken Ira P. Rothken 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff MEGAUPLOAD LTD. 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED: 13 ___________________________________ 14 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 ATTESTATION UNDER GENERAL ORDER 45, SECTION X.B. I have the authorization of Plaintiff’s counsel to submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. 20 21 /s/ Kelly M. Klaus 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- JOINT STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. C-11-6216 CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?