Megaupload Ltd v. Universal Music Group Inc
Filing
27
ORDER Granting 19 Stipulation Extending Defendant's Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. Responses due by 1/24/2012. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/3/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2012)
1
2
3
4
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
KELLY M. KLAUS (SBN 161091)
Kelly.Klaus@mto.com
355 South Grand Avenue
Thirty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone:
(213) 683-9100
Facsimile:
(213) 687-3702
5
6
7
8
9
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
JONATHAN H. BLAVIN (SBN 230269)
Jonathan.Blavin@mto.com
560 Mission Street
Twenty-Seventh Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2907
Telephone:
(415) 512-4000
Facsimile:
(415) 512-4077
ROTHKEN LAW FIRM
IRA P. ROTHKEN (SBN 160029)
JARED R. SMITH (SBN 130343)
3 Hamilton Landing, Suite 280
Novato, CA 94949
Telephone: (415) 924-4250
Facsimile: (415) 924-2905
Email: ira@techfirm.com
Email: jared@techfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MEGAUPLOAD LTD.
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
OAKLAND DIVISION
15
16
MEGAUPLOAD LTD.,
CASE NO. C-11-6216 CW
17
Plaintiff,
18
v.
19
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S
TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC.,
[CIVIL L.R. 6-1(a), 6-2]
20
Defendant.
21
Judge:
Honorable Claudia Wilken
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. C-11-6216 CW
1
2
WHEREAS Plaintiff Megaupload Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) served the Complaint in this matter on
Universal Music Group, Inc. (“Defendant”) on December 13, 2011;
3
WHEREAS under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A)(i), the deadline for
4
Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint would otherwise be January 3, 2012;
5
WHEREAS, given the holiday season, Defendant has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed,
6
that Defendant may have an additional twenty-one (21) days to answer or otherwise respond to
7
the Complaint;
8
WHEREAS Plaintiff has requested, and Defendant has agreed, that if Defendant chooses
9
to file a motion after having 42 days to prepare it, Plaintiff may have no less than 21 days after in
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
which to prepare its Opposition thereto;
WHEREAS there have been no prior time modifications in the case, and the extension
stipulated to herein will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court Order;
THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a) and 6-2, Plaintiff and Defendant
STIPULATE as follows:
Defendant shall have through and including January 24, 2012 to answer or otherwise
respond to the Complaint.
In the event that Plaintiff files a motion or other pleading than an answer, Plaintiff shall
have through and including February 14, 2012 to file its opposition thereto.
Nothing in this stipulation precludes the parties, should they mutually agree to do so, from
20
entering and submitting to the Court a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order with a different briefing
21
schedule for both opposition and reply briefing.
22
SO STIPULATED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
JOINT STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. C-11-6216 CW
1
DATED: December 23, 2011
2
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
By: /s/ Kelly M. Klaus
Kelly M. Klaus
3
Attorneys for Defendant
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC.
4
5
6
DATED: December 23, 2011
ROTHKEN LAW FIRM
By: /s/ Ira P. Rothken
Ira P. Rothken
7
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MEGAUPLOAD LTD.
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED:
13
___________________________________
14
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
ATTESTATION UNDER GENERAL ORDER 45, SECTION X.B.
I have the authorization of Plaintiff’s counsel to submit this Stipulation and
[Proposed] Order.
20
21
/s/ Kelly M. Klaus
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
JOINT STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. C-11-6216 CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?