Mission National Bank v. St. Paul Mercury Insuarance Company
Filing
24
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/16/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2012)
1 KYLE M. FISHER (SBN 127334)
kfisher@frigolaw.com
2 JOHN N. MACLEOD (SBN 269073)
jmacleod@frigolaw.com
3 FRIEDEMANN GOLDBERG LLP
420 Aviation Boulevard, Suite 201
4 Santa Rosa, California 95403
Telephone: (707) 543-4900
5 Facsimile: (707) 543-4910
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
MISSION NATIONAL BANK
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12 MISSION NATIONAL BANK, a national
banking association,
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE
16 COMPANY,
Case No. CV11 6336 YGR
HONORABLE YVONNE GONZALEZ
ROGERS
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
AND ORDER
Defendant.
17
18
ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE
19 COMPANY,
Counterclaimant,
20
vs.
21
MISSION NATIONAL BANK, a national
22 banking association,
23
Counterdefendant.
24
25
26
27
28
{00232099.DOC;v1}
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their
2 designated counsel that the above-captioned action, including both the complaint and the
3 counterclaim, be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of
4 Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).
5
6 DATED: June 28, 2012
FRIEDEMANN GOLDBERG LLP
7
8
By: /s/ Kyle M. Fisher
KYLE M. FISHER
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
MISSION NATIONAL BANK
9
10
11 DATED: July 10, 2012
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP
12
13
By: /s/ Kenneth D. Watnick
KENNETH D. WATNICK
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE
COMPANY
14
15
16
21
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
nz
onne Go
Judge Yv
NO
22
RT
23
ER
25
ers
A
H
24
alez Rog
LI
20
Dated: July 16, 2012
R NIA
UNIT
ED
19
RT
U
O
S
18
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
17
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
26
27
28
{00232099.DOC;v1}
1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?