Mission National Bank v. St. Paul Mercury Insuarance Company

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/16/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2012)

Download PDF
1 KYLE M. FISHER (SBN 127334) kfisher@frigolaw.com 2 JOHN N. MACLEOD (SBN 269073) jmacleod@frigolaw.com 3 FRIEDEMANN GOLDBERG LLP 420 Aviation Boulevard, Suite 201 4 Santa Rosa, California 95403 Telephone: (707) 543-4900 5 Facsimile: (707) 543-4910 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant MISSION NATIONAL BANK 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 MISSION NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE 16 COMPANY, Case No. CV11 6336 YGR HONORABLE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER Defendant. 17 18 ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE 19 COMPANY, Counterclaimant, 20 vs. 21 MISSION NATIONAL BANK, a national 22 banking association, 23 Counterdefendant. 24 25 26 27 28 {00232099.DOC;v1} STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their 2 designated counsel that the above-captioned action, including both the complaint and the 3 counterclaim, be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of 4 Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). 5 6 DATED: June 28, 2012 FRIEDEMANN GOLDBERG LLP 7 8 By: /s/ Kyle M. Fisher KYLE M. FISHER Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant MISSION NATIONAL BANK 9 10 11 DATED: July 10, 2012 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP 12 13 By: /s/ Kenneth D. Watnick KENNETH D. WATNICK Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY 14 15 16 21 ERED O ORD IT IS S nz onne Go Judge Yv NO 22 RT 23 ER 25 ers A H 24 alez Rog LI 20 Dated: July 16, 2012 R NIA UNIT ED 19 RT U O S 18 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 17 N F D IS T IC T O R C 26 27 28 {00232099.DOC;v1} 1 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?