Astiana v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. et al

Filing 34

ORDER. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/16/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2012)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

MARY LITTLEHALE,
Plaintiff(s),

8
9

ORDER

THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC.
Et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

v.

No. C 11-06342 PJH

12

Defendant(s).
_______________________________/

13
On April 2, 2012, the court approved a stipulation of the parties that plaintiff be
14
permitted additional time to and including April 6, 2012 to respond to defendants’ motion to
15
dismiss in view of her anticipated amended complaint. The amended complaint was filed
16
on April 6, 2012 but no opposition to the motion was filed. The parties shall immediately
17
meet and confer and advise the court 1) whether the pending motion is withdrawn by
18
defendants in light of the amended complaint, or 2) whether plaintiff stipulates to the
19
dismissal of the original complaint in light of the amended complaint. As defendants may
20
move to dismiss the first amended complaint, the court sees no reason to review a motion
21
attacking a complaint that is no longer operative. The parties shall advise the court no later
22
than noon on Friday April 20, 2012.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: April 16, 2012
25
26
27
28

______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge