Hutchins v. Alameda County et al
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS re 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Alameda County. Replies due by 4/10/2012. Plaintiff's Opposition due by 4/3/2012. 4/3/12 hearing date is vacated. Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 4/24/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/20/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOHN FRANCIS HUTCHENS,
Case No.: 4:11-cv-06478-YGR
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
ALAMEDA COUNTY, et al.,
Northern District of California
United States District Court
On February 21, 2012, Defendants Alameda County and County of Alameda Sheriff Deputies
filed a Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 9.) Plaintiff’s
opposition was due on March 9, 2012. (Dkt. Nos. 12 & 13.) The hearing on this motion is scheduled
for April 3, 2012.
To date, Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff shall file his
opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by April 3, 2012. Failure to file an opposition by that date will
result in dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff submits his opposition by this
date, Defendants shall reply by April 10, 2012.
The hearing date of April 3, 2012 is hereby VACATED. The Court re-sets the hearing for
April 24, 2012 at 2:00 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 20, 2012
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?