Cook v. Cate et al
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING re 108 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Change Date of Case Management Conference filed by T. Wood, Everett W. Fischer, M. Markel, Matthew Cate, G. D. Lewis, D . Foston, A. Dornbeck, J. Diggle, J. A. Harrison, M. Cook, D. Van Leer, R. Cox, C. E. Wilber, Scott Troy Cook, J. E. Pieren, F. Juaquez, P. Wenning, D. Jacquez, Keri Berkler, D. W. Bradbury, K. McGuyer, R. Graves, F. Jacquez. Court VACAT ES case management conference set for 3/16/15. Compliance Hearing is set for Friday, 4/24/2015 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/24/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2015)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SCOTT TROY COOK,
Case No. 11-cv-06581-YGR
MATTHEW CATE, ET AL.,
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND SETTING COMPLIANCE
Re: Dkt. No. 108
United States District Court
Northern District of California
The Court has reviewed the stipulation of the parties concerning the case management
conference and hereby VACATES the conference currently set for Monday, March 16, 2015.
This matter is set for a compliance hearing on Friday, April 24, 2015, at 9:01 a.m. The
parties are directed to meet and confer regarding the need for a case management conference
during the pendency of the appeal in this matter. The parties are directed to file, no later than
April 17, 2015, a joint statement addressing the status of the appeal and the need for a case
management conference during its pendency. If the Court is satisfied with the status statement,
the compliance hearing will be vacated and the parties need not appear.
This terminates Docket No. 108.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 24, 2015
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?