Cook v. Cate et al

Filing 127

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON REMAND AND DISMISSING ACTION re 70 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by T. Wood, Everett W. Fischer, M. Markel, Matthew Cate, G. D. Lewis, D. Foston, A. Dornbeck, J. Diggle, J. A. Harrison, M . Cook, D. Van Leer, R. Cox, C. E. Wilber, J. E. Pieren, F. Juaquez, P. Wenning, D. Jacquez, Keri Berkler, D. W. Bradbury, K. McGuyer, R. Graves, 125 USCA Memorandum. Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of defendants G. Lewis, D . Bradbury, K. McGuyer, M. Cook, E. Fischer, J. Harrison, K. Berkler, R. Cox, T. Wood, D. Foston, D. Van Leer, R. Graves, J. Diggle, P. Wenning, J. Pieren, M. Market, A. Dornback, and D. Jacquez. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/9/17. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2017)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

SCOTT TROY COOK,
Plaintiff,

7
vs.

8

CASE NO. 11-cv-06581-YGR
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ON REMAND AND DISMISSING ACTION
Re: Dkt. Nos. 70, 125

9

MATTHEW CATE, ET AL.,
Defendants.

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15

In light of the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal issued April 12, 2017 (Dkt.
No. 125), and the mandate issued May 4, 2017 (Dkt. No. 126), the Court ORDERS as follows:
1. The portion of this Court’s August 14, 2014 Order (Dkt. No. 89) denying defendants’
motion for summary judgment on due process and qualified immunity grounds is VACATED.
2. For the reasons stated in the Ninth Circuit’s decision, summary judgment is GRANTED in

16

favor of defendants G. Lewis, D. Bradbury, K. McGuyer, M. Cook, E. Fischer, J. Harrison, K.

17

Berkler, R. Cox, T. Wood, D. Foston, D. Van Leer, R. Graves, J. Diggle, P. Wenning, J. Pieren,

18

M. Markel, A. Dornback, and D. Jacquez.1

19

3. Based upon the foregoing, this action is DISMISSED.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21

Dated: May 9, 2017
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
1

28

Defendants C.E. Wilber, Mathew Cate and F. Jaquez all were dismissed previously by
the Court’s August 14, 2014 Order.