Chiquita Fresh North America L.L.C. v. Green Transport Company et al

Filing 59

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING The court hereby orders Plaintiff and Defendant Greene Transport Company to each submit by no later than 12 p.m. on May 3, 2013 supplemental briefing related to Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 53 . Each brief is not to exceed seven pages. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 04/26/13. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 CHIQUITA FRESH NORTH AMERICA, LLC, 12 Plaintiff, No. C-11-06683 DMR ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING 13 v. 14 GREENE TRANSPORT COMPANY, et al. 15 16 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The court hereby orders Plaintiff and Defendant Greene Transport Company to each submit by no later than 12 p.m. on May 3, 2013 supplemental briefing on the following issues: (1) whether Ohio has a substantial relationship to the parties or their transactions, and facts supporting that argument; (2) whether there is a reasonable basis for the parties’ choice of law, and facts supporting that argument; (3) if the parties’ choice of Ohio law is contrary to a fundamental policy of California, and if so (4) whether California has a materially greater interest than Ohio; and (5) whether Defendant Greene Transport Company concedes that the choice-of-law provision designating Ohio law applies to the parties’ disputes at issue in Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Docket No. 53]. Each brief is not to exceed seven pages. Parties may, however, attach as exhibits any evidence or facts relevant to the above issues. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 26, 2013 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?