Webster Proctor v. Nike Retail Services, Inc. et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/17/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 HOFFMAN EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS, LLP Michael Hoffman, Esq. (State Bar No. 154481) mhoffmanemployment-lawyers.com Leonard Emma, Esq. (State Bar No. 224483) 1emniaemployment-1awyers.com 580 California Street, Suite 1600 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 362-1111 Facsimile: (415)362-1112 Attorneys for Plaintiff WEBSTER PROCTOR 7 8 9 10 11 12 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Jon D. Meer (State Bar No. 144389) jmeerseyfarth.com Sheryl L. Skibbe (State Bar No. 199441) sskibbejmeerseyfarth.com Casey J.T. McCoy (State Bar No. 229106) cjtmcoy@seyfarth.com 2029 Century Park East, 35th Floor Los Angeles, California 90067-3021 Telephone: (310) 277-7200 Facsimile: (310) 201-5219 13 14 15 16 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Simon L. Yang (State Bar No. 260286) syangseyfarth.com 333 South Hope Street, Suite 3900 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 270-9600 Facsimile: (213) 270-9601 17 18 Attorneys for Defendant NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 WEBSTER PROCTOR, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and the general public 25 Plaintiffs, v. NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC., an Oregon corporation, 26 Defendant. 27 [Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers] ORDER APPROVING 23 24 CASE NO. 1 1-CV-671 1 YGR T 4 JOII STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE IPROPOSED ORDER THEREON] Complaint Filed: FAC Filed: SAC Filed: TAC Filed: December 29, 2011 March 14, 2012 Apr. 20, 2012 May 3, 2012 28 JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CASE NO.1 l-CV-671 1 YGR ______ ____________________________________ IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective attorneys of 1 2 record, that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of 3 Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1). The undersigned counsel represent that they are fully authorized by their 4 respective clients to enter into this Stipulation for Dismissal. I attest that concunence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other 5 6 Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document. 7 8 DATED: October 15, 2012 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 9 10 By: Is! Sheryl L. Skibbe Sheryl L. Skibbe Simon L. Yang Attorneys for Defendant NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC. 11 12 13 14 DATED: October 15, 2012 15 HOFFMAN EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS, LLP Is! Leonard Emma Michael Hoffman Leonard Emma Attorneys for Plaintiff WEBSTER PROCTOR By: 16 17 18 19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 22 23 Dated: 10/17/12 Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CASENO. 11-CV-67l1 YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?