In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation

Filing 698

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers Granting 696 Stipulation Modifying Briefing Schedule on Defendant's 690 Daubert Motion. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2023)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

BETSY C. MANIFOLD (182450)
RACHELE R. BYRD (190634)
WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER
FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
750 B Street, Suite 1820
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 619/234-4599
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
MARK C. RIFKIN (pro hac vice)
MATTHEW M. GUINEY (pro hac vice)
THOMAS H. BURT (pro hac vice)
WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER
FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
270 Madison Ave
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Interim Class Counsel for Plaintiffs
[Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page]

15
16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

OAKLAND DIVISION

20
21
22
23

IN RE APPLE IPHONE ANTITRUST
LITIGATION

No. 4:11-cv-06714-YGR
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S
DAUBERT MOTION

24
25

Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANT’S DAUBERT MOTION
Case No. 11-cv-06714-YGR

1

Plaintiffs Robert Pepper, Stephen H. Schwartz, Edward W. Hayter, and Edward Lawrence

2

(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and

3

through their respective counsel, hereby agree as follows:

4
5
6
7

WHEREAS, on September 26, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a Renewed Motion for Class
Certification (ECF No. 665, 683);
WHEREAS, the hearing on Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification is currently
set for June 23, 2023;

8

WHEREAS, on March 10, 2023, Apple filed its Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion

9

for Class Certification (ECF No. 689) and a Daubert Motion to Exclude the Testimony of

10

Professor Daniel L. McFadden and Dr. Rosa Abrantes-Metz (ECF No. 310) (the “Daubert

11

Motion”);

12

WHEREAS, the Daubert Motion is thirty (30) pages as permitted by this Court’s Order

13

Regarding Briefing Limits for Apple’s Daubert Motion (ECF No. 686), is also noticed for hearing

14

on June 23, 2023, and cites to six (6) of the seven (7) expert reports filed by Apple concurrently

15

with its Daubert Motion and its opposition to Plaintiffs’ renewed class certification motion;

16
17

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs believe that they need to take depositions of Apple’s experts in order
to adequately address Apple’s arguments in its Daubert Motion;

18

WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and agree that, given the number and

19

complexity of the issues implicated in the Daubert Motion, the Parties require additional time for

20

opposition and reply than that provided for by the Civil Local Rules;

21

WHEREAS, the hearing on the Daubert Motion is noticed for June 23, 2023, to be heard

22

concurrently with Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification and, therefore, an extension

23

of the opposition and reply deadlines on the Daubert Motion will not impact the hearing date;

24

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among the Parties,

25

through their respective counsel and subject to the approval of the Court, to the entry of an Order

26

modifying the schedule as follows:

27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANT’S DAUBERT MOTION
Case No. 11-cv-06714-YGR

-1-

1

1.

2

2. Apple’s reply in further support of its Daubert Motion shall be due on May 19, 2023.

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Apple’s Daubert Motion shall be due on April 21, 2023; and

3
4

DATED: March 23, 2023

5

WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER
FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
By:

/s/ Rachele R. Byrd
RACHELE R. BYRD

6

BETSY C. MANIFOLD (182450)
RACHELE R. BYRD (190634)
750 B Street, Suite 1820
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 619/234-4599

7
8
9
10

MARK C. RIFKIN (pro hac vice)
MATTHEW M. GUINEY (pro hac vice)
THOMAS H. BURT (pro hac vice)
WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER
FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
270 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10016
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 212/545-4677

11
12
13
14
15

Interim Class Counsel for Plaintiffs

16

DAVID C. FREDERICK (pro hac vice)
AARON M. PANNER (pro hac vice)
KELLOGG, HANSEN, TODD, FIGEL &
FREDERICK, P.L.L.C.
1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400
Washington, D.C. 20036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

17
18
19
20
21
22

Counsel for Plaintiffs
23
24
25

DATED: March 23, 2023

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
By:

/s/ Cynthia E. Richman
CYNTHIA E. RICHMAN

26
27
28

Cynthia E. Richman (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANT’S DAUBERT MOTION
Case No. 11-cv-06714-YGR

-2-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Harry R. S. Phillips
[e-mail]
1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036-5306
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.530.9691
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. (132099)
[e-mail]
Richard J. Doren (124666)
[e-mail]
Daniel G. Swanson (116556)
[e-mail]
Jay P. Srinivasan (181471)
[e-mail]
Dana Lynn Craig
[e-mail]
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
Veronica S. Lewis (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1100
Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 214.571.2900
Ethan D. Dettmer (196046)
[e-mail]
Rachel S. Brass (219301)
[e-mail]
Caeli A. Higney (268644)
[e-mail]
Eli M. Lazarus (284082)
[e-mail]
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
555 Mission Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.8306
Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANT’S DAUBERT MOTION
Case No. 11-cv-06714-YGR

-3-

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3
4

DATED: 4/3/2023
THE HONORABLE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANT’S DAUBERT MOTION
Case No. 11-cv-06714-YGR

-4-

1

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(h)(3), the filer of this document hereby attests

2
3

that the concurrence of the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory

4

hereto.
DATED: March 23, 2023

5

/s/ Rachele R. Byrd
RACHELE R. BYRD

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

29291

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANT’S DAUBERT MOTION
Case No. 11-cv-06714-YGR

-5-