Green v. Bechtel Corporation
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 20 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/23/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2012)
1 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID H. GREENBERG
DAVID H. GREENBERG - State Bar No. 37950
2 R. SCOTT HOUTZ - State Bar No. 180061
shoutz@caltrialpros.com
3 6100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1170
Los Angeles, California 90048
4 Telephone No.: (323) 782-0500
5
Fax No.: (323) 782-0543
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6 ROBERT W. GREEN
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
ROBERT W. GREEN,
15
16
Plaintiff,
vs.
17
BECHTEL CORPORATION;
18 BECHTEL CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY; and DOES 1 through
19 100, inclusive,
20
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: C12-00055 CW
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
VOLUNTARILY DISMISS
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATION
Plaintiff ROBERT W. GREEN and defendant BECHTEL
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY hereby stipulate that all of Plaintiff’s claims
against Defendants in the above-captioned matter be voluntarily dismissed with
prejudice, without costs or fees awarded to either party, pursuant to the parties’
settlement agreement in this matter.
28
STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION
1
1 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
3 DATED: August 17, 2012
4
LAW OFFICES OF DAVID H.
GREENBERG
5
By:
6
7
8
9
DATED: August 17, 2012
/s/ R. Scott Houtz
R. Scott Houtz
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBERT W. GREEN
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
10
By:
11
12
13
/s/ Thomas M. McInerney
Thomas M. McInerney
Attorneys for Defendant
BECHTEL CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY
14
ORDER
15
16
Based on the foregoing stipulation between the parties, it is hereby ordered
17 that the above-entitled matter be dismissed with prejudice, without costs or fees
18 awarded to either party.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
22
8/23/2012
DATED: __________________
_________________________
Honorable Claudia Wilken
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?