Solis v. Seafood Peddler of San Rafael, Inc. et al

Filing 58

ORDER re objections to discovery order. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 10/11/2012. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2012)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5
6

HILDA L. SOLIS,

7
8
9

v.

No. C 12-0116 PJH
ORDER RE OBJECTIONS TO
DISCOVERY ORDER

SEAFOOD PEDDLER OF SAN RAFAEL,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff(s),

12

Before the court are the objections filed by both parties to Magistrate Judge Cousins’

13

discovery order of September 24, 2012. By operation of Civil L.R. 72-2, the motions for

14

relief from the order are deemed denied if no action by the district court is taken within 14

15

days of the date the motions are filed. Typically, no responses are permitted and no

16

hearing is held. However, the court has reviewed the motions and has determined that an

17

appearance of counsel is required to answer questions not answered by the parties’

18

papers. The court would prefer that any additional briefing come after a hearing.

19

Accordingly, by this order the court suspends operation of Rule 72-2 pending an

20

appearance by counsel. The court had hoped to resolve these objections quickly and

21

informally, but has been advised that all counsel are unavailable for an appearance on

22

October 17, 2012, as requested. The parties shall therefore confer and submit a stipulation

23

for a hearing on October 31 or November 1, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. If counsel is unavailable for

24

either of these dates, the hearing will be held in conjunction with the case management

25

conference on November 15, 2012 at 2:00 p.m.

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 11, 2012
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge