Amie v. City of Martinez et al

Filing 34

ORDER VACATING SHOW CAUSE HEARING/COMPLIANCE HEARING re 33 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by City of Martinez, Maisha Amie, Tom J. Simonetti, Zachary Poertner, Tyson Muncher, Martinez Police Department. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 9/27/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2012)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7
8

MAISHA AMIE,

9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12

Plaintiff(s),

Case No.: 12-CV-00145 YGR
ORDER VACATING SHOW CAUSE HEARING

vs.
CITY OF MARTINEZ et al.,
Defendant(s).

13
14

The Court has reviewed the parties’ response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause why they

15

should not be sanctioned for failing to comply with the Court’s Standing Order regarding discovery

16

disputes. The Court VACATES the Compliance Hearing set for Friday, September 28, 2012, and will

17

not impose sanctions at this time.

18

The parties may refile a joint letter brief that complies with the Court’s Standing Order in

19

Civil Cases. The parties are reminded that pursuant to the Standing Order, the parties must “attest

20

that, prior to filing the request for relief, counsel met and conferred in person and must concisely

21

summarize those remaining issues that counsel were unable to resolve. … The Court will then

22

advise the parties if additional briefing, a telephonic conference, or a personal appearance is

23

necessary.” (See Standing Order in Civil Cases ¶ 8(b).) This articulated process allows the Court to

24

manage discovery disputes in an efficient manner.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: September 27, 2012

__________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE