Morinville et al v. Oracle Corporation et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Case referred to Private ADR.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 4/2/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Steven R. Daniels (Cal. Bar No. 235398) Wayne M. Harding (Tex. Bar No. 08978500) FARNEY DANIELS LLP 800 S. Austin Ave., Suite 200 Georgetown, Texas 78626 Telephone: (512) 582-2828 Facsimile: (512) 582-2829 E-Mails: SDaniels@farneydaniels.com WHarding@farneydaniels.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS PAUL V. MORINVILLE and ORG STRUCTURE INNOVATIONS LLC 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 12 13 PAUL V. MORINVILLE and ORG STRUCTURE INNOVATIONS LLC, Case No. 12-cv-00297-SBA 14 Plaintiffs, Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong 15 v. STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 16 17 ORACLE CORPORATION and ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 18 Defendants. 19 20 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 21 following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 22 The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 23 24 Private ADR: Private mediation with Hon. Edward A. Infante (Ret.), scheduled for June 6, 2012. 25 26 The parties agree to hold the ADR session by the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 27 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise 28 ordered.) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS -1- CASE NO. 12-CV-00297-SBA 1 2 Dated: March 20, 2012 FARNEY DANIELS, LLP 3 4 /s/ Steven R. Daniels Steven R. Daniels 5 Attorney for Plaintiffs PAUL V. MORINVILLE and ORG STRUCTURE INNOVATIONS LLC 6 7 8 Dated: March 20, 2012 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 9 10 /s/ Maren J. Clouse Maren J. Clouse 11 Attorneys for Defendants ORACLE CORPORATION and ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 12 13 14 I, Steven R. Daniels, attest that Maren J. Clouse has read and approved this Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting ADR Process and consents to its filing in this action. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS -2- CASE NO. 12-CV-00297-SBA 1 2 The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: 4/2/12 10 UNITED STATES JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 Rev. 12/11 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS -3- CASE NO. 12-CV-00297-SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?