Hill et al v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al

Filing 33

ORDER re Statement of Undisputed Material Facts. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 07/22/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 CHRIS HILL, 9 11 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS v. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ 13 14 On July 18, 2013, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, [Docket No. 28], but 15 did not file a joint statement of undisputed material facts with the motion. Pursuant to this court’s 16 Standing Order, motions for summary judgment shall be accompanied by a joint statement of the 17 material facts not in dispute by citations to admissible evidence. Accordingly, by no later than July 18 26, 2013, Defendants shall file a joint statement of undisputed material facts regarding the motion 19 and shall file an amended motion for summary judgment that references the joint statement of 20 undisputed material facts. Defendants’ amended motion for summary judgment may not contain any 21 arguments that were not presented in the motion that was filed on July 18, 2013. The briefing and 22 hearing schedule for the motion for summary judgment shall otherwise remain unchanged. 23 RT H ER R NIA NO 28 DONNA M. RYU . Ryu onna M United States e D Judg Magistrate Judge FO 27 Dated: July 22, 2013 LI 26 DERED O OR IT IS S A 25 S IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 24 UNIT ED For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C-12-00372 DMR N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?