Hill et al v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al
Filing
33
ORDER re Statement of Undisputed Material Facts. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 07/22/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
CHRIS HILL,
9
11
12
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE STATEMENT OF
UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS
v.
BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, et
al.,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
13
14
On July 18, 2013, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, [Docket No. 28], but
15
did not file a joint statement of undisputed material facts with the motion. Pursuant to this court’s
16
Standing Order, motions for summary judgment shall be accompanied by a joint statement of the
17
material facts not in dispute by citations to admissible evidence. Accordingly, by no later than July
18
26, 2013, Defendants shall file a joint statement of undisputed material facts regarding the motion
19
and shall file an amended motion for summary judgment that references the joint statement of
20
undisputed material facts. Defendants’ amended motion for summary judgment may not contain any
21
arguments that were not presented in the motion that was filed on July 18, 2013. The briefing and
22
hearing schedule for the motion for summary judgment shall otherwise remain unchanged.
23
RT
H
ER
R NIA
NO
28
DONNA M. RYU
. Ryu
onna M
United States e D
Judg Magistrate Judge
FO
27
Dated: July 22, 2013
LI
26
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
A
25
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
24
UNIT
ED
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C-12-00372 DMR
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?