Hill et al v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al
Filing
37
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 36 . Settlement Conference set for 8/6/2013 is VACATED and will be rescheduled at a later date. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/5/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
DALE L. ALLEN, JR., SBN 145279
KEVIN P. ALLEN, SBN 252290
LOW, BALL & LYNCH
505 Montgomery Street, 7th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-2584
Telephone (415) 981-6630
Facsimile (415) 982-1634
Attorneys for Defendants
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT
(Sued as Bay Area Rapid Transit District) (hereinafter "BART");
KENTON RAINEY in his official capacity as CHIEF OF POLICE
FOR BART; JAMES CROWELL, individually and in his official
capacity as a Police Officer for BART; and MYRON LEE,
individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for BART
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. SBN 69888
ADANTE D. POINTER Esq. SBN 236229
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Centre
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CHRIS HILL, a personal representative of the ESTATE OF CHARLES HILL;
The ESTATE OF CHARLES HILL
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
CHRIS HILL, a personal representative of the )
ESTATE OF CHARLES HILL; The ESTATE )
OF CHARLES HILL,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, et )
al.
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No. 4:12-cv-00372 DMR
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
MANDATORY SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
///
28
-1STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
USDC CASE NO. 4:12-cv-00372 DMR
1
The parties hereby stipulate (and respectfully request) that the Mandatory Settlement
2
Conference currently scheduled for August 6, 2013 be rescheduled until mid-to-late September.
3
The reason for the request is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication,
4
currently scheduled to be heard August 22, 2013. The likelihood of productive, successful MSC
5
is greater after the Motion is heard and ruled upon.
6
Because the parties do not know the exact date the Court will issue its ruling regarding
7
Defendants’ Motion, the parties respectfully request a date in mid-to-late September. If the
8
ruling has not been issued by then, the parties request a MSC date sometime after the ruling is
9
issued.
10
SO STIPULATED.
11
12
Dated: August 2, 2013
LOW, BALL & LYNCH
13
14
By ____________/s/_____________________
DALE L. ALLEN, JR.
KEVIN P. ALLEN
Attorneys for Defendants
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID
TRANSIT DISTRICT (Sued as Bay Area
Rapid Transit District) (hereinafter
"BART"); KENTON RAINEY in his
official capacity as CHIEF OF POLICE
FOR BART; JAMES CROWELL,
individually and in his official capacity as a
Police Officer for BART; and MYRON
LEE, individually and in his official
capacity as a Police Officer for BART
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Dated: August 2, 2013
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
23
24
25
26
27
By ___________/s/______________________
JOHN L. BURRIS
ADANTE D. POINTER
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CHRIS HILL, a personal representative of
the ESTATE OF CHARLES HILL;
The ESTATE OF CHARLES HILL
28
-2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
USDC CASE NO. 4:12-cv-00372 DMR
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Pursuant to the Stipulated Request herein, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory
3
Settlement Conference -- currently scheduled for August 6, 2013 -- be vacated. It will be
4
rescheduled for a later date, pending the Court’s ruling on Defendants’ pending Motion for
5
Summary Judgment/Summary Adjudication.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
ER
H
13
thanael M
Judge Na
FO
. Cousins
R NIA
___________________________________
HON. NATHANAEL COUSINS
RT
12
August 5, 2013
LI
11
Dated:
TED
A
10
UNIT
ED
9
GRAN
NO
8
RT
U
O
S
7
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
USDC CASE NO. 4:12-cv-00372 DMR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?