Maxim I Properties v. Krohn et al

Filing 344

ORDER (AS MODIFIED) granting 343 Joint Stipulation and Request for ADR via Settlement Conference and Request for Continuance of Further Case Management Conference: This case is referred to a randomly-assigned Magistrate Judge to conduct a Settle ment Conference which shall be completed within 90 days, or as soon thereafter as is convenient to the assigned Magistrate Judge's calendar. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/30/2023 01:30 PM is vacated and continued to 12/20/2023 01 :30 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. Parties shall file an updated joint Case Management Conference Statement by 12/13/2023. All counsel and parties may access the webinar information (public hearings) at https://cand.uscourts.gov/judges/ryu-donna-m-dmr/. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/18/2023. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2023)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 GREGORY P. O’HARA, SBN 131964 gohara@nixonpeabody.com LAUREN M. MICHALS, SBN 184473 lmichals@nixonpeabody.com NIXON PEABODY LLP One Embarcadero Center, 32nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone No. (415) 984-8200 Facsimile No. (415) 984-8300 Attorneys for Plaintiff MAXIM I PROPERTIES 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAXIM I PROPERTIES, a general partnership, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. A.M. BUD KROHN, et al., 15 Defendants. Case No. 4:12-cv-00449 DMR JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ADR VIA SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER (AS MODIFIED) 16 Judge: Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu 17 18 19 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS 20 21 22 23 This Joint Request for Alternative Dispute Resolution via Settlement Conference, and request 24 to continue the scheduled further case management conference, is submitted on behalf of all parties 25 remaining in this litigation, pursuant to ADR Local Rule (L.R.). 7-1. 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ADR VIA SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER (AS MODIFIED) Case No. 4:12-cv-00449 DMR 4869-6598-0534.2 460280-000002 1 WHEREAS, the undersigned parties, which are the remaining parties in this case, have been 2 engaged in productive settlement discussions and believe further, more structured dispute resolution 3 processes will further settlement; 4 WHEREAS, the undesigned parties have met and conferred, pursuant to ADR L.R. 3-5, on an 5 appropriate ADR procedure and are in agreement that a settlement conference before a judicial 6 officer of this court is appropriate and would be beneficial at this time; 7 8 9 10 11 WHEREAS, the undersigned parties are available for a settlement conference on September 13, 14 or 15, 2023; WHEREAS, a case management conference is currently scheduled for this case for August 30, 2023, at 1:30 p.m.; WHEREAS, the parties are in agreement that the requested settlement conference should take 12 place prior to the next case management conference so that any unresolved and/or outstanding issue 13 resulting from the settlement conference can be addressed at a case management conference; 14 NOW THEREFOR, the parties hereby stipulate and jointly request: 15 1) That all parties be ordered to a mandatory settlement conference before a judicial officer 16 17 of this court, preferably to take place on either September 13, 14 or 15, 2023; 2) That the further case management conference currently scheduled for August 30, 2023, be 18 19 continued to a date after the completion of the settlement conference. IS IT SO STIPULATED AND REQUESTED. 20 21 Date: August 11, 2023 NIXON PEABODY LLP 22 By: /s/ Gregory P. O’Hara Gregory P. O’Hara Lauren M. Michals Attorneys for Plaintiff MAXIM I PROPERTIES 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ADR VIA SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER (AS MODIFIED) Case No. 4:12-cv-00449 DMR 4869-6598-0534.2 460280-000002 1 Dated: August 11, 2023 SOMACH SIMMONS & DUNN 2 By: /s/ Theresa C. Barfield Theresa C. Barfield Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Claimant MOYER PRODUCTS, INC. 3 4 5 6 Dated: August 11, 2023 BAY LAW GROUP, LLP 7 By: /s/ Joshua A. Bloom Joshua A. Bloom Attorneys for Third Party Defendant and Cross-Claimant RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC. (FKA INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.) 8 9 10 11 12 Dated: August 11, 2023 BERKES CRANE SANTANA & SPANGLER LLP 13 14 By: 15 16 17 18 Dated: August 11, 2023 /s/ Laurie S. Julien Laurie S. Julien Viiu Spangler Khare Attorneys for Defendant CENTRAL COATING COMPANY, INC. SILICON VALLEY LAW GROUP 19 By: /s/ Kathryn E. Barrett Jeffrey Scott Lawson Kathryn E. Barrett Attorneys for Defendants TELEWAVE, INC., and THERMIONICS LABORATORY, INC. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ADR VIA SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER (AS MODIFIED) Case No. 4:12-cv-00449 DMR 4869-6598-0534.2 460280-000002 1 2 Dated: August 11, 2023 LEWIS, BRISBOIS, BISGAARD & SMITH 3 By: /s/ Robert W. Farrell Glenn A. Friedman Robert W. Farrell Attorneys for Defendant THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY 4 5 6 7 8 Dated: August 11, 2023 BURNHAM BROWN 9 By: /s/ Charles Alfonzo Charles Alfonzo Attorneys for Defendant A.M. BUD KROHN and NATIONAL AUTO RECOVERY BUREAU, INC. 10 11 12 13 14 Dated: August 11, 2023 PAHL & McCAY 15 16 By: /s/ Servando R. Sandoval Servando R. Sandoval Attorneys for Defendant SPRAYTRONICS, INC. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 // // // // // // // 26 27 28 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ADR VIA SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER (AS MODIFIED) Case No. 4:12-cv-00449 DMR 4869-6598-0534.2 460280-000002 1 2 I, Lauren M. Michals, attest under penalty of perjury that I have obtained permission of the above named counsel to affix their signatures hereto. 3 4 Dated: August 11, 2023 NIXON PEABODY LLP 5 By: 6 7 /s/ Lauren M. Michals Lauren M. Michals lmichals@nixonpeabody.com Attorneys for Plaintiff MAXIM I PROPERTIES 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ADR VIA SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER (AS MODIFIED) Case No. 4:12-cv-00449 DMR 4869-6598-0534.2 460280-000002 1 ORDER (AS MODIFIED) 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HERE BY 3 ORDER THAT: 4 1. This case is referred to a randomly-assigned Magistrate Judge to conduct a Settlement 5 Conference which shall be completed within 90 days, or as soon thereafter as is 6 convenient to the assigned Magistrate Judge's calendar. 7 2. The further case management conference currently scheduled for August 30, 2023 at 1:30 8 p.m. is vacated and continued to December 20, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. in Oakland, by 9 Videoconference only. Parties shall file an updated joint case management conference 10 statement by December 13, 2023. All counsel and parties may access the webinar 11 information (public hearings) at https://cand.uscourts.gov/judges/ryu-donna-m-dmr/. 16 u a M. Ry onn _________________________ Judge D RT By: NO 15 R NIA DATED: August 18, 2023 FO 14 ERED O ORD D S S I T I DIFIE AS MO LI IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED. UNIT ED 13 ISTRIC ES D TC T TA RT U O S 12 17 A H DONNA M. RYU C ER N Magistrate O F Chief D I S T I C T Judge R 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ADR VIA SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER (AS MODIFIED) Case No. 4:12-cv-00449 DMR 4869-6598-0534.2 460280-000002

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?