Wacoh Company v. Analog Devices Inc. et al

Filing 114

ORDER OF DISMISSAL, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 9/14/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

655 MARINER’S ISLAND BLVD , SUITE 306
SAN MATEO, CA 94404
[phone]
DAVID@MAKMANLAW COM

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A . MAKMAN

10
11
12

Matthew J.M. Prebeg (pro hac vice)
Brent T. Caldwell (pro hac vice)
CLEARMAN PREBEG LLP
815 Walker, Suite 1040
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Vinay V. Joshi (S.B.N. 213487)
Kiran P. Gupta (S.B.N. 213954)
TUROCY & WATSON LLP
560 S Winchester Blvd Suite 500
San Jose, California 95128
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

David A. Makman (S.B.N. 178195)
LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A. MAKMAN
90 New Montgomery St., Suite 600
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

Attorney for Defendant
INVENSENSE INC.

Attorneys for Plaintiff
WACOH COMPANY

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

14
15
16

WACOH COMPANY,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20

v.

CASE NO.4:12-cv-00530 PJH
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE
PARTIES’ AGREED MOTION TO DISMISS
INVENSENSE, INC. UNDER FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii)
& 41(c)

INVENSENSE, INC.
Noticed Hearing Date & Time: N/A
Defendant.

Courtroom: B – 15th Floor

21

Judge: U.S. Dist. Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

22

Date Transferred: February 02, 2012

23

Initial Case Management Conference: June 14, 2012

24

Trial Date: To Be Determined

25
26
27
28
CASE NO.C 12-00530 PJH

Page 1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE
PARTIES’ AGREED MOTION TO
DISMISS

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES’ AGREED MOTION TO DISMISS
INVENSENSE, INC. UNDER FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii) & 41(c)

2
The Court has reviewed the agreed motion to dismiss filed by Plaintiff Wacoh Company

3
4

(“Wacoh” or “Plaintiff”), and Defendant InvenSense, Inc. (“InvenSense” or “Defendant”), in

5

which the parties notify the Court they have settled and stipulate to the following terms:

6
7
8

1.

that Wacoh dismisses with prejudice of all its claims against InvenSense in this

2.

that InvenSense dismisses with prejudice of all of its counter-claims against

suit.

9
Wacoh in this suit, except for its counterclaims regarding invalidity which are dismissed without
11
12
13
14
15
16

prejudice.
3.

that Wacoh and InvenSense, respectively, each shall bear its own attorney fees

and costs incurred in connection with this action.
4.

that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties and the settlement

agreement for purposes of resolving any disputes that may arise under it.
Having reviewed the parties’ agreed motion to dismiss and the other files and pleadings

17
of record and deeming itself fully advised, the Court HEREBY GRANTS the parties’ agreed
18

ENTERED this 14th day of September, 2012.
___

25

RT

27

hylli
Judge P

ER

H

28
CASE NO.C 12-00530 PJH

ilton

s J. Ham

NO

26

ERED

_________________________________
O ORD
IT IS S
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

R NIA

24

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

23

S

22

FO

21

parties’ stipulation set out in their agreed motion to dismiss, as of the date this order is entered.

LI

20

motion, and ORDERS that this matter is HEREBY DISMISSED, according to the terms of the

A

19

UNIT
ED

655 MARINER’S ISLAND BLVD , SUITE 306
SAN MATEO, CA 94404
[phone]
DAVID@MAKMANLAW COM

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A . MAKMAN

10

N

C
F
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE
D IS T IC T O
R
Page 2 PARTIES’ AGREED MOTION TO
DISMISS