Harkonen v. United States Department of Justice et al

Filing 15

ORDER REGARDING FILING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on April 17, 2012. (cwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 W. SCOTT HARKONEN, M.D., 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; and UNITED STATES OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, No. C 12-629 CW ORDER REGARDING FILING DEADLINES FOR RESPONSE AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. ________________________________/ 11 On April 9, 2012, Defendants United States Department of 12 Justice and United States Office of Management and Budget filed a 13 motion to dismiss the complaint filed against them by Plaintiff W. 14 Scott Harkonen, M.D. 15 On April 17, 2012, after Defendants requested reassignment to 16 a District Court Judge, the case was re-assigned to the 17 undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 73-1. 18 re-assignment, the hearing date for Defendants’ motion to dismiss 19 was vacated. 20 Because of the See Docket No. 13. The briefing schedule on Defendants’ motion to dismiss was 21 not vacated or altered upon re-assignment of this action. 22 Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, Plaintiff’s opposition to 23 Defendants’ motion, if any, is due by April 23, 2012, and 24 Defendants’ reply in further support of their motion, if any, is 25 due by April 30, 2012. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: April 17, 2012 28 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?