Harkonen v. United States Department of Justice et al
Filing
15
ORDER REGARDING FILING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on April 17, 2012. (cwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2012)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
W. SCOTT HARKONEN, M.D.,
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE; and UNITED STATES OFFICE
OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET,
No. C 12-629 CW
ORDER REGARDING
FILING DEADLINES
FOR RESPONSE AND
REPLY TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS
Defendants.
________________________________/
11
On April 9, 2012, Defendants United States Department of
12
Justice and United States Office of Management and Budget filed a
13
motion to dismiss the complaint filed against them by Plaintiff W.
14
Scott Harkonen, M.D.
15
On April 17, 2012, after Defendants requested reassignment to
16
a District Court Judge, the case was re-assigned to the
17
undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 73-1.
18
re-assignment, the hearing date for Defendants’ motion to dismiss
19
was vacated.
20
Because of the
See Docket No. 13.
The briefing schedule on Defendants’ motion to dismiss was
21
not vacated or altered upon re-assignment of this action.
22
Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, Plaintiff’s opposition to
23
Defendants’ motion, if any, is due by April 23, 2012, and
24
Defendants’ reply in further support of their motion, if any, is
25
due by April 30, 2012.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated: April 17, 2012
28
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?