Bias et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
Filing
148
Order by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting in part and denying in part 145 Discovery Letter Brief.(jcslc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
LATARA BIAS, et al.,
7
Case No. 12-cv-00664-YGR (JCS)
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
DISCOVERY ORDER
9
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al.,
10
Re: Dkt. No. 145
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
The Court has received the parties’ Join Letter Brief, filed October 8, 2014, concerning the
12
13
parties’ disputes regarding: “(1) one of the topics noticed by Plaintiffs in a Rule 30(b)(6)
14
deposition notice; (2) one of Plaintiffs’ requests for admission; and (3) all deposition transcripts,
15
expert reports, and declarations produced in a separate action pending in the Southern District of
16
Iowa.” Dkt. No. 145 at 1. A hearing on these issues was held on October 17, 2014, at 9:30 a.m.
17
Good cause appearing, and for the reasons stated on the record, the Court rules as follows:
1.
18
Defendant is ordered to provide a 30(b)(6) witness to testify regarding invoices and
19
cash reimbursement requests made by Wells Fargo to Fannie Mae for out-of-pocket expenses for
20
broker price opinions during the class period, to the extent requested by Plaintiff’s Amended
21
Notice of Deposition of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank’s Attachment A. See Dkt. No. 145-1 at 4.
2.
22
23
Plaintiff’s request to compel a response to its Third Set of Requests for Admission,
see Dkt. No. 145-2, is DENIED.
24
3.
25
Plaintiff’s request to compel production of documents related to the Huyer action1
is denied.
26
27
28
1
Huyer v. Wells Fargo & Co., 4:08-cv-507-RP-CFB (S.D. Iowa)
1
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 20, 2014
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?