Tessera, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al

Filing 114

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE AN ANSWER OR OTHER RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDERING PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH SCHEDULING ORDER IN RELATED CASE. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/1/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2012)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

TESSERA, INC.,

5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

No. C 12-692 CW

Plaintiff,

ORDER REQUIRING
DEFENDANTS TO FILE
AN ANSWER OR OTHER
RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFF’S
AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND ORDERING
PARTIES TO COMPLY
WITH SCHEDULING
ORDER IN RELATED
CASE

v.
QUALCOMM, INC.; FREESCALE
SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; ATI
TECHNOLOGIES, ULC,
Defendants.
________________________________/

The Courts ORDERS Defendants Qualcomm, Inc., Freescale

12

Semiconductor, Inc, and ATI Technologies, ULC to answer or

13

otherwise respond to Plaintiff Tessera, Inc.’s Amended Complaint

14

within ten days of the date of this Order.

15

The Parties are ORDERED to comply with the scheduling order

16

set on January 4, 2012 in the related case, Tessera, Inc. v.

17

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al., Case No. 05-4063, Docket No.

18

947, including any amendments thereto, unless the Parties obtain

19

relief from the scheduling order.

20

the deadline for the Parties to this action to add additional

21

parties or claims.

22

The Court sets April 9, 2012 as

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: 3/1/2012

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge