Tessera, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al

Filing 219

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS 200 OBJECTION TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPECIAL MASTER. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/9/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2012)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

TESSERA, INC.,
Plaintiff,

5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

No. C 12-692 CW
ORDER REGARDING
DEFENDANTS’
OBJECTION TO THE
REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF
THE SPECIAL MASTER
(Docket No. 200)

v.
MOTOROLA, INC.; QUALCOMM, INC.;
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.;
and ATI TECHNOLOGIES, ULC,
Defendants.
________________________________/
AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
/

Defendants ATI Technologies ULC, Freescale Semiconductor,

13

Inc. and Qualcomm, Inc. object to the Special Master’s Report and

14

Recommendation (Docket No. 1026 in Case No. 05-4063) regarding

15

their motions to strike Plaintiff Tessera, Inc.’s Amended

16

Disclosure of Infringement Contentions.

17

Docket No. 200.

Pursuant to the Amended Order of Reference to the Special

18

Master, Defendants were required to submit with their objection

19

any record necessary for the Court to review the Special Master’s

20

Report and Recommendation.

21

motions to strike filed by Freescale and Qualcomm have been filed

22

in the docket, see Docket Nos. 155 and 175, Defendants have not

23

provided the Court with the complete briefing that was submitted

24

to the Special Master.

Docket No. 138 ¶ 6.3.

Although the

25

Accordingly, within three Court days of the date of this

26

Order, Defendants shall provide the Court with chambers copies of

27

all documents that any party submitted to the Special Master in

28

connection with these motions, except those already filed in the

1

docket of this action.

2

these documents in the docket or shall file a motion for leave to

3

file the documents under seal, and shall file a declaration

4

attesting that they have provided the Court with all documents

5

required by this Order.

6
7
8

By that date, Defendants shall also file

Defendants’ failure to comply with the requirements of this
Order will result in their objections being overruled.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

Dated:

12-692
10/9/2012

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2