Tessera, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al

Filing 372

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 370 Stipulation of Final Dismissal (Qualcomm CDMA Technologies Asia Pacific PTE Ltd). (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

GREGORY P. STONE (SBN: 078329)
gregory.stone.mto.com
TED G. DANE (SBN: 143195)
[e-mail]
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 S. Grand Ave., 35th Fl.
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

DAVID H. DOLKAS (SBN: 111080)
[e-mail]
DAVID L. LARSON (SBN: 112342)
[e-mail]
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

FRED H. BARTLIT, JR. (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
ERIC R. OLSON (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
SEAN GRIMSLEY (SBN: 216741)
[e-mail]
Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP
1899 Wynkoop St., 8th Fl.
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

DANIEL R. FOSTER (SBN: 179753)
[e-mail]
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
4 Park Plaza, Suite 1700
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
Qualcomm CDMA Technologies Asia Pacific
Pte. Ltd.

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
TESSERA, INC.

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
OAKLAND DIVISION
16
17
CASE NO. 4:12-CV-00692-CW
18

TESSERA, INC.,
Plaintiff and
Counterdefendant,

19

STIPULATION AND ORDER
OF FINAL DISMISSAL

20
v.
21
22
23
24
25

MOTOROLA, INC., QUALCOMM, INC.,
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
and ATI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendants.
AND RELATED COUNTER CLAIMS

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
OF FINAL DISMISSAL

CASE NO. 4:12-CV-00692-CW

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and

2

Counterdefendant Tessera, Inc. (“Tessera”) and Defendant Qualcomm CDMA Technologies Asia

3

Pacific Pte. Ltd. (“QCTAP”), that the stay of the above-captioned action against QCTAP shall be

4

lifted.

5

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and

6

(c), that all claims and counterclaims as between Tessera and QCTAP in the above-captioned

7

matter be, and upon approval are, dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own

8

costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.

9
10

DATED: March 30, 2014

11

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
By: /s/ Ted G. Dane
Ted G. Dane

12

Attorney for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
TESSERA, INC.

13
14
15

DATED: March 30, 2014

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
By: /s/ David H. Dolkas
David H. Dolkas

16
17

Attorney for Defendant and Counterclaimant
QUALCOMM CDMA TECHNOLOGIES ASIA
PACIFIC PTE. LTD.

18
19
20
21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

DATED:

4/1/2014

The Honorable Claudia Wilken

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
OF FINAL DISMISSAL

-2-

CASE NO. 4:12-CV-00692-CW

1
2

CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE
I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from

3

counsel for Qualcomm Incorporated, David H. Dolkas.

4

Dated: March 30, 2014

/s/ Zachary M. Briers

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
OF FINAL DISMISSAL

-3-

CASE NO. 4:12-CV-00692-CW