Oracle America, Inc. v. Service Key, LLC et al
Filing
141
ORDER Following January 14, 2013 Status Conference. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
Geoffrey M. Howard (SBN 157468)
geoff.howard@bingham.com
Thomas S. Hixson (SBN 193033)
thomas.hixson@bingham.com
Kyle Zipes (SBN 251814)
kyle.zipes@bingham.com
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Telephone: 415.393.2000
Facsimile: 415.393.2286
ORACLE CORPORATION
Dorian Daley (SBN 129049)
dorian.daley@oracle.com
Deborah K. Miller (SBN 95527)
deborah.miller@oracle.com
500 Oracle Parkway
M/S 5op7
Redwood City, CA 94065
Telephone: 650.506.4846
Facsimile: 650.506.7114
12
13
14
15
ORACLE CORPORATION
Jeffrey S. Ross (SBN 138172)
jeff.ross@oracle.com
10 Van de Graaff Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
Telephone: 781.744.0449
Facsimile: 781.238.6273
16
17
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Oracle America, Inc.
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EUREKA DIVISION
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware
corporation;
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 4:12-cv-00790-SBA (NJV)
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOLLOWING
JANUARY 14, 2013 STATUS
CONFERENCE
SERVICE KEY, LLC, a Georgia limited liability
company; ANGELA VINES; DLT FEDERAL
BUSINESS SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation; and DOES 1–50,
Defendants.
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOLLOWING JANUARY 14, 2013 STATUS CONFERENCE
Case No. 4:12-cv-00790 SBA (NJV)
1
On January 8, 2013 Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc. (“Oracle”) and Defendant DLT-
2
Federal Business Systems (“DLT-FBS”) filed a joint letter brief regarding DLT-FBS’s discovery
3
responses. The Court set the matter for a status conference on Monday, January 14, 2013, at
4
10:00 am. Following the status conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
5
1. By 4pm on January 18, 2013, the Dunlap Weaver firm (DLT-FBS’s counsel of
6
record as of the status conference) shall provide to Michael C. Whittacir of
7
NOVA IP Law (who as of the status conference expects to substitute in as DLT-
8
FBS’s substitute counsel) the remaining emails for which optical character
9
recognition software has to be used to make certain attachments searchable.
10
2. By 4pm on January 25, 2013, DLT-FBS shall complete its document production
11
12
to Oracle.
3. The parties shall be prepared to discuss DLT-FBS’s document production,
13
including any concerns Oracle has with it, at the January 29, 2013 status
14
conference
15
4. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, the depositions of Geoff Prosser and Michael
16
Johnson that were scheduled for February 1 and 2 will be rescheduled. The
17
parties shall meet and confer on deposition dates. If they are unable to reach
18
agreement, the Court will address this issue at the January 29, 2013 status
19
conference.
20
5. The parties shall meet and confer concerning the issues raised in the letter brief
21
about DLT-FBS’s interrogatory responses. If they are unable to reach agreement,
22
the Court will address this issue at the January 29, 2013 status conference.
23
6. The parties shall meet and confer concerning Oracle’s motion to reclassify DLT-
24
FBS’s attorneys-eyes only designations under the Protective Order (Dkt No. 109).
25
If they are unable to reach agreement, the Court will address this motion at the
26
January 29, 2013 status conference.
27
28
7. Oracle’s request for attorneys’ fees is not ruled on at this time but will be taken up
at the January 29, 2013 status conference.
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOLLOWING JANUARY 14, 2013 STATUS CONFERENCE
Case No. 4:12-cv-00790 SBA (NJV)
1
8. Oracle and DLT-FBS shall submit a joint letter by January 28, 2013 informing the
2
Court which of the above issues remain in dispute.
3
9. There shall be a further status conference on January 29, 2013 at 1:00 pm.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED:
DATED:
January 23, 2013
, 2012
By:
Hon. Nandor J. Vadas
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOLLOWING JANUARY 14, 2013 STATUS CONFERENCE
Case No. 4:12-cv-00790 SBA (NJV)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?