Oracle America, Inc. v. Service Key, LLC et al

Filing 141

ORDER Following January 14, 2013 Status Conference. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP Geoffrey M. Howard (SBN 157468) geoff.howard@bingham.com Thomas S. Hixson (SBN 193033) thomas.hixson@bingham.com Kyle Zipes (SBN 251814) kyle.zipes@bingham.com Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: 415.393.2000 Facsimile: 415.393.2286 ORACLE CORPORATION Dorian Daley (SBN 129049) dorian.daley@oracle.com Deborah K. Miller (SBN 95527) deborah.miller@oracle.com 500 Oracle Parkway M/S 5op7 Redwood City, CA 94065 Telephone: 650.506.4846 Facsimile: 650.506.7114 12 13 14 15 ORACLE CORPORATION Jeffrey S. Ross (SBN 138172) jeff.ross@oracle.com 10 Van de Graaff Drive Burlington, MA 01803 Telephone: 781.744.0449 Facsimile: 781.238.6273 16 17 Attorneys for Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation; Plaintiff, v. No. 4:12-cv-00790-SBA (NJV) [PROPOSED] ORDER FOLLOWING JANUARY 14, 2013 STATUS CONFERENCE SERVICE KEY, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company; ANGELA VINES; DLT FEDERAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1–50, Defendants. 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOLLOWING JANUARY 14, 2013 STATUS CONFERENCE Case No. 4:12-cv-00790 SBA (NJV) 1 On January 8, 2013 Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc. (“Oracle”) and Defendant DLT- 2 Federal Business Systems (“DLT-FBS”) filed a joint letter brief regarding DLT-FBS’s discovery 3 responses. The Court set the matter for a status conference on Monday, January 14, 2013, at 4 10:00 am. Following the status conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 5 1. By 4pm on January 18, 2013, the Dunlap Weaver firm (DLT-FBS’s counsel of 6 record as of the status conference) shall provide to Michael C. Whittacir of 7 NOVA IP Law (who as of the status conference expects to substitute in as DLT- 8 FBS’s substitute counsel) the remaining emails for which optical character 9 recognition software has to be used to make certain attachments searchable. 10 2. By 4pm on January 25, 2013, DLT-FBS shall complete its document production 11 12 to Oracle. 3. The parties shall be prepared to discuss DLT-FBS’s document production, 13 including any concerns Oracle has with it, at the January 29, 2013 status 14 conference 15 4. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, the depositions of Geoff Prosser and Michael 16 Johnson that were scheduled for February 1 and 2 will be rescheduled. The 17 parties shall meet and confer on deposition dates. If they are unable to reach 18 agreement, the Court will address this issue at the January 29, 2013 status 19 conference. 20 5. The parties shall meet and confer concerning the issues raised in the letter brief 21 about DLT-FBS’s interrogatory responses. If they are unable to reach agreement, 22 the Court will address this issue at the January 29, 2013 status conference. 23 6. The parties shall meet and confer concerning Oracle’s motion to reclassify DLT- 24 FBS’s attorneys-eyes only designations under the Protective Order (Dkt No. 109). 25 If they are unable to reach agreement, the Court will address this motion at the 26 January 29, 2013 status conference. 27 28 7. Oracle’s request for attorneys’ fees is not ruled on at this time but will be taken up at the January 29, 2013 status conference. 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOLLOWING JANUARY 14, 2013 STATUS CONFERENCE Case No. 4:12-cv-00790 SBA (NJV) 1 8. Oracle and DLT-FBS shall submit a joint letter by January 28, 2013 informing the 2 Court which of the above issues remain in dispute. 3 9. There shall be a further status conference on January 29, 2013 at 1:00 pm. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED: DATED: January 23, 2013 , 2012 By: Hon. Nandor J. Vadas United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOLLOWING JANUARY 14, 2013 STATUS CONFERENCE Case No. 4:12-cv-00790 SBA (NJV)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?