Oracle America, Inc. v. Service Key, LLC et al

Filing 172

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 164 Motion for Leave to File (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 OAKLAND DIVISION 4 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, 5 Plaintiff, 6 vs. 7 SERVICE KEY, LLC, a Georgia limited 8 liability company; ANGELA VINES; DLT FEDERAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS 9 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1-50, 10 Defendants. 11 Case No: C 12-00790 SBA ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING Dkt. 164 12 13 Defendant DLT Federal Business Systems Corporation (“DLT”) has filed a pro se 14 Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing. Dkt. 164. Though DLT offers no reason for 15 its motion, the Court notes that DLT’s present counsel of record—RIMON P.C. and NOVA IP 16 Law, PLLC—have filed a motion to withdraw based on DLT’s apparent severance of their 17 attorney-client relationship. Dkt. 163. However, the motion to withdraw has not yet been 18 adjudicated and substitute counsel has not yet appeared in the action for DLT. 19 “It is a longstanding rule that ‘[c]orporations and other unincorporated associations 20 must appear in court through an attorney.’” See D-Beam Ltd. P’ship v. Roller Derby Skates, 21 Inc., 366 F.3d 972, 973-974 (9th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted); Civ. L.R. 3-9 (“A corporation, 22 unincorporated association, partnership or other such entity may appear only through a member 23 of the bar of this Court.”). Since DLT cannot appear pro se, and because the Court has not 24 addressed its counsel’s motion to withdraw, DLT’s motion is DENIED. This Order terminates 25 Docket 164. 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 14, 2013 _______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?