Oracle America, Inc. v. Service Key, LLC et al
Filing
172
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 164 Motion for Leave to File (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2013)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
OAKLAND DIVISION
4 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
5
Plaintiff,
6
vs.
7
SERVICE KEY, LLC, a Georgia limited
8 liability company; ANGELA VINES; DLT
FEDERAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS
9 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; and
DOES 1-50,
10
Defendants.
11
Case No: C 12-00790 SBA
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC
FILING
Dkt. 164
12
13
Defendant DLT Federal Business Systems Corporation (“DLT”) has filed a pro se
14
Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing. Dkt. 164. Though DLT offers no reason for
15
its motion, the Court notes that DLT’s present counsel of record—RIMON P.C. and NOVA IP
16
Law, PLLC—have filed a motion to withdraw based on DLT’s apparent severance of their
17
attorney-client relationship. Dkt. 163. However, the motion to withdraw has not yet been
18
adjudicated and substitute counsel has not yet appeared in the action for DLT.
19
“It is a longstanding rule that ‘[c]orporations and other unincorporated associations
20
must appear in court through an attorney.’” See D-Beam Ltd. P’ship v. Roller Derby Skates,
21
Inc., 366 F.3d 972, 973-974 (9th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted); Civ. L.R. 3-9 (“A corporation,
22
unincorporated association, partnership or other such entity may appear only through a member
23
of the bar of this Court.”). Since DLT cannot appear pro se, and because the Court has not
24
addressed its counsel’s motion to withdraw, DLT’s motion is DENIED. This Order terminates
25
Docket 164.
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 14, 2013
_______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?