Oracle America, Inc. v. Service Key, LLC et al

Filing 95

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting in part and denying in part 91 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
Geoffrey M. Howard (SBN 157468)
[e-mail]
Thomas S. Hixson (SBN 193033)
[e-mail]
Kyle Zipes (SBN 251814)
[e-mail]
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, California 94111-4067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.2286
ORACLE CORPORATION
Dorian Daley (SBN 129049)
[e-mail]
Deborah K. Miller (SBN 95527)
[e-mail]
500 Oracle Parkway
M/S 5op7
Redwood City, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.506.7114
ORACLE CORPORATION
Jeffrey S. Ross (SBN 138172)
[e-mail]
10 Van de Graaff Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 781.238.6273
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

19
20
21

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Plaintiff,

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

v.
SERVICE KEY, LLC, a Georgia limited
liability company; ANGELA VINES; DLT
FEDERAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; and
DOES 1-50,

No. 4:12-cv-00790-SBA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN
PART AND DENYING IN PART
PLAINTIFF ORACLE AMERICA’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF
THE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND SUPPORTING
EXHIBITS

Defendant.
Case No. 4:12-cv-00790-SBA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ORACLE AMERICA’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER
SEAL PORTIONS OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SUPPORTING EXHIBITS

Pending before this Court is Oracle America, Inc.’s (“Oracle”) Motion to File

1
2

Under Seal Portions of the Second Amended Complaint and Supporting Exhibits.
Having considered (1) Oracle’s Motion; (2) the Stipulation to Permit Oracle to

3
4

File Under Seal; (3) the supporting Declarations submitted by Defendnats and non-party Avnet,

5

Inc.; (4) the Second Amended Complaint and supporting exhibits,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Oracle’s Motion to Seal is GRANTED IN

6
7

PART and DENIED IN PART. The request to seal portions of the Second Amended Complaint

8

is DENIED. See Kamakana v. City of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (noting

9

“general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and

10

documents.”). However, the Court grants leave to file the following exhibits to the Second

11

Amended Complaint under seal:

12



Exhibit A;

13



Exhibit J;

14



Exhibit K; and

15



Exhibit L.

16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18
19
20

DATED: _12/20/12

______________________________________
Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:12-cv-00790-SBA
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ORACLE AMERICA’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER
SEAL PORTIONS OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SUPPORTING EXHIBITS