Reed v. Government Employees Insurance Company
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/31/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2012)
: 264287
MICHAEL R' WENDLBERGER' SBN
1670 S. Amphlett Blvd., ste' 214
San Mateo, CA94402
Tel: (650) 378-2404
Fax: (650) 378-2405
1
2
4
LOUiS A. LIBERTY, SBN: t+7975
370 Bridge ParkwaY
Redwood Ciry, CA 94065
Tel: (650) 341-0300
Fax: (650) 341-0302
5
6
7
I
Attorneys for Plaintiff
REVA REED
9
t0
UìíITED STATTES DTSTRICT COURT
ll
NORTHER.N DIS'TRIC'I OF C'\LTFORNIA
t')
t-
OAKLAND DTVISION
l3
t+
REV'\ REED, an individual.
Case No:
I
I
)
t5
PLAIN'IIFF,
)
ì
l6
l7
18
l9
20
)
VS-
)
E
GOVER,NMENT EùIPLOYEES INSU RANC
ðOurp¡.xv, a Maryland companl-, and DOES I
through J0, inclusive,
)
l: ll-CV-00791-PJI-t
STIPULATION OF DISMiSSAL
WI'IH PREruDICE
Judse: I{onorable Phyllis J'Hamrlton
är,õ órRemoval: February t7,20ll
Trial Date: None
)
)
)
DEFENDANTS
)
)
)
2ì
)
'r1
)
)
,ì
')
24
?s
26
2'l
STIPULATION OF DISùIISSAL \ryITII PRBJUDTCE
plaintiff rraving aEeed to
rerease
ail craims against
Det'endant and Detèndanr having agreed
parties have agreed to dismiss this matter with
not to seek sanctions related tp this matter, the
28
DtS|VIISSAL OF .\CTION WITH PRE'ruDICE
I
prejudice All parties agree to bear their own attomeys' fees and costs
2
)
Respectfully Submitted
4
5
Dated: M;ay 15,2Q12
6
Michael Wendlberger
Attorney for Plaintif{,
1
REVAREED
I
9
10
Dated: lr4ay 75,2012
By
1l
Carmody
12
t3
Attorney for Defendant,
GOVERNMENT EMPLO YEES INS
COMPANY
14
15
l6
IT IS SO ORDERED
t7
5/31/12
R NIA
n
Hamilto
A
H
ER
hyllis J.
FO
Judge P
LI
RT
)1
D
E
Phyllis J. Hamilton ORDER
O
IT IS S
United States District Judge
NO
2l
UNIT
ED
20
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
19
S
i8
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
23
24
25
26
27
28
0
5 Aúthle¡r
¡
lt^fEo.
,d 9G
9a402
¿¡4
cÂ
2
DISMISSAL OF ACTIONWITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?