Dykes v. Department of Correction and Rehabilitation/Warden

Filing 3

ORDER OF TRANSFER. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/25/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 JOHNNY A. DYKES, Petitioner, 8 9 v. ORDER OF TRANSFER DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION AND REHABILITATION/WARDEN, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C 12-0888 PJH (PR) Respondent. 12 / 13 This is a habeas case filed pro se by a state prisoner. Petitioner seeks to challenge a 14 conviction obtained in the Superior Court in and for Fresno County. Fresno County is in the 15 venue of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Petitioner is 16 incarcerated at California State Prison, Solano Prison, which is in the Eastern District. 17 Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district 18 of conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); this district is neither. Because petitions challenging a 19 conviction are preferably heard in the district of conviction, Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Laue v. 20 Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968), and petitioner was convicted in Fresno 21 County, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern 22 District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: May 25, 2012. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\PJH\HC.12\DYKES0888.TRN.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?