Fotinos v. Fotinos et al
Filing
86
ORDER by Judge Claudia WilkenGRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS 85 EX PARTE APPLICATION RE: DOCUMENTS CONTAINING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
MICHELE FOTINOS, on behalf of
herself and as Guardian ad Litem
for her minor children, R.F. and
A.F.,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
v.
JOHN FOTINOS; DAWN GROVER; RENEE
LA FARGE; BONNIE MILLER; KAMALA
HARRIS, Attorney General; JAYNE
KIM, Chief Trial Counsel, State
Bar of California; ROBYN PITTS,
City of Belmont Police Officer;
MARK REED, San Mateo County
Deputy Sheriff; PATRICK CAREY,
San Mateo County Deputy Sheriff;
SHANNON MORGAN; CITY OF BELMONT;
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO; and RENEE
LAFARGE,
No. C 12-953 CW
ORDER GRANTING IN
PART PLAINTIFF’S
EX PARTE
APPLICATION RE:
DOCUMENTS
CONTAINING
CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION
Defendant.
________________________________/
On March 19, 2013, the Court issued an order directing
22
Plaintiff (1) to take steps properly to file under seal unredacted
23
documents related to her opposition to Defendant Attorney General
24
Kamala Harris’s motion to dismiss and on the public docket
25
redacted versions of those same documents, and (2) to take other
26
steps to ensure that her other filings did not improperly include
27
confidential information on the public docket.
28
1
Plaintiff has filed an ex parte motion related to the March
2
19, 2013 order.
3
record in the case, the Court orders as follows:
Having considered Plaintiff’s filing and the
4
1. Relying on Plaintiff’s counsel’s representation that she will
5
not appeal the dismissal with prejudice of her claims against
6
Defendant Harris, the Court will strike from the public
7
record all documents related to her opposition to Defendant
8
Harris’s motion to dismiss.
9
redacted or unredacted versions of her opposition to
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Plaintiff need not re-file
Defendant Harris’s motion or the exhibits thereto.
11
2. The Court grants Plaintiff until April 9, 2013 to comply with
12
the instructions beginning at Page 3, line 26 of its March
13
19, 2013 order.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
Dated: 4/1/2013
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?