Fotinos v. Fotinos et al

Filing 86

ORDER by Judge Claudia WilkenGRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS 85 EX PARTE APPLICATION RE: DOCUMENTS CONTAINING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

MICHELE FOTINOS, on behalf of
herself and as Guardian ad Litem
for her minor children, R.F. and
A.F.,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

v.
JOHN FOTINOS; DAWN GROVER; RENEE
LA FARGE; BONNIE MILLER; KAMALA
HARRIS, Attorney General; JAYNE
KIM, Chief Trial Counsel, State
Bar of California; ROBYN PITTS,
City of Belmont Police Officer;
MARK REED, San Mateo County
Deputy Sheriff; PATRICK CAREY,
San Mateo County Deputy Sheriff;
SHANNON MORGAN; CITY OF BELMONT;
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO; and RENEE
LAFARGE,

No. C 12-953 CW
ORDER GRANTING IN
PART PLAINTIFF’S
EX PARTE
APPLICATION RE:
DOCUMENTS
CONTAINING
CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION

Defendant.
________________________________/
On March 19, 2013, the Court issued an order directing

22

Plaintiff (1) to take steps properly to file under seal unredacted

23

documents related to her opposition to Defendant Attorney General

24

Kamala Harris’s motion to dismiss and on the public docket

25

redacted versions of those same documents, and (2) to take other

26

steps to ensure that her other filings did not improperly include

27

confidential information on the public docket.

28

1

Plaintiff has filed an ex parte motion related to the March

2

19, 2013 order.

3

record in the case, the Court orders as follows:

Having considered Plaintiff’s filing and the

4

1. Relying on Plaintiff’s counsel’s representation that she will

5

not appeal the dismissal with prejudice of her claims against

6

Defendant Harris, the Court will strike from the public

7

record all documents related to her opposition to Defendant

8

Harris’s motion to dismiss.

9

redacted or unredacted versions of her opposition to

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

Plaintiff need not re-file

Defendant Harris’s motion or the exhibits thereto.

11

2. The Court grants Plaintiff until April 9, 2013 to comply with

12

the instructions beginning at Page 3, line 26 of its March

13

19, 2013 order.

14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16
17
18

Dated: 4/1/2013

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2