Burrows et al v. OneWest Bank et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to File Amended Complaint filed by OneWest Bank, Carolee Burrows, Robert Burrows. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/1/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2012)

Download PDF
  1 2 3 4 5 September J. Katje, Esq. (SBN 227896) CONSUMER LITIGATION LAW CENTER, APC 100 N. Barranca Ave., Suite 700 West Covina, CA 91791 Telephone: (800) 787-5616 Fax: (888) 909-7947 sk@consumerlitigationlawcenter.com Attorney for Plaintiffs, ROBERT BURROWS and CAROLEE BURROWS 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 12 ROBERT BURROWS and CAROLEE BURROWS, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 vs. ONEWEST BANK, a Federal Savings Bank, formerly known as INDYMAC FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK successor in interest to FIRST NATIONAL LENDING SERVICES, a California Corporation; MERIDIAN TRUST DEED SERVICE, INC., a California Corporation; and all persons or entities unknown claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien or interest in the property described in this complaint adverse to Plaintiffs’ title thereto, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 4:12-CV-00995-SBA STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT OF RIGHT IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT 24 25 26 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant Onewest Bank, FSB (“Defendant” or “Onewest”) and Plaintiffs Robert Burrows and Carolee Burrows (“Plaintiffs”), by and 27 28 through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO ONEWEST’S MOTION TO DISMISS   1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their V e r i f i e d Complaint on February 6, 2012; 2 WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Notice of Removal to this Court February 27, 2012; 3 WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint on April 9, 4 2012; 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff has requested and Onewest has consented to extend Plaintiffs an 6 7 additional fourteen (14) days from execution of this stipulation for the filing of 8 Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint of right originally due April 30, 2012; 9 10 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs will file the First Amended Complaint of right on or before May 14, 2012 upon approval of the Stipulation; 11 12 WHEREAS, upon filing Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint in accordance with 13 this stipulation, the hearing set for May 22, 2012, to hear Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss 14 will be vacated upon the Court’s approval; 15 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, 16 through their respective counsel, that Plaintiff shall file its First Amended Complaint in 17 18 response to O n e w e s t’s Motion to Dismiss on or before May 14, 2012. 19 Dated: April 30, 2012 CONSUMER LITIGATION LAW CENTER, APC 20 By:_____/s/ September J. Katje__________ SEPTEMBER J. KATJE, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiffs, ROBERT BURROWS and CAROLEE BURROWS 21 22 23 24 Dated: April ___, 2012 ALLEN, MATKINS, LECK, GAMBLE, MALLORY & NATSIS LLP 25 26 27 28 By:___________________________________ NICHOLAS B. WARANOFF, ESQ. Attorney for ONEWEST BANK, a Federal Savings Bank 2 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO ONEWEST’S MOTION TO DISMISS   ORDER 1 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 3 1. The Plaintiffs are granted an extension of time to file their First Amended Complaint 4 of Right to Defendant Onewest Bank’s Motion to Dismiss until on or before May 14, 5 2012. 6 2. Upon the filing of Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint in accordance with 7 this stipulation, the hearing set for May 22, 2012 to hear Defendant’s Motion to 8 Dismiss will be vacated upon the Court’s approval. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 14 Dated: 5/1/12 ______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO ONEWEST’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?