Fazio v. Apple, Inc

Filing 14

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 11 Stipulation Consolidating Cases and Appointing Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2012)

Download PDF
1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 2 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS Post Montgomery Center 3 One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 4 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) 5 BARNOW AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. 6 BEN BARNOW ERICH P. SCHORK 7 One North LaSalle Street, Suite 4600 8 Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: 312/621-2000 9 312/641-5504 (fax) 10 GARDY & NOTIS, LLP James S. Notis 11 Jennifer Sarnelli (State Bar No. 242510) 501 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1408 12 New York, NY 10017 Telephone: 212/905-0509 13 212/905-0508 (fax) 14 [Proposed] Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 15 [Additional counsel appear on signature page.] 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN JOSE DIVISION 19 20 FRANK M. FAZIO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 21 Plaintiff, 22 vs. 23 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 24 Defendant. 25 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 12-cv-01127 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND APPOINTING PLAINTIFFS’ CO-LEAD COUNSEL 26 27 [Additional caption on following page] 28 696614_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND APPOINTING PLAINTIFFS’ CO-LEAD COUNSEL - 12-cv-01127 -1- 1 DANIEL M. BALASSONE and BENJAMIN ) SWARTZMAN, Individually and on Behalf of ) 2 All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) 3 Plaintiff, ) ) 4 vs. ) ) 5 APPLE, INC., and DOES 1-100. ) ) 6 Defendant. ) ) 7 Case No. 12-cv-01384 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 696614_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND APPOINTING PLAINTIFFS’ CO-LEAD COUNSEL - 12-cv-01127 -2- 1 WHEREAS, there are two consumer actions on behalf of purchasers of defendant Apple 2 Inc.’s (“Apple” or “Defendant”) iPhone 4S that are pending in this District: 3 Abbreviated Case Name Case Number Date Filed Fazio v. Apple Inc., a California corporation 12-cv-01127 March 6, 2012 Balassone v. Apple, Inc., and DOES 1-100 12-cv-01384 March 20, 2012 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, the two consumer actions identified above arise out of the same transactions 8 and occurrences and involve the same or substantially similar issues of law and fact, and 9 therefore, should be consolidated for all purposes under Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a)1; 10 WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs in the above-referenced actions have met and 11 conferred and agree the cases should be consolidated; 12 WHEREAS, after meeting and conferring, all plaintiffs and plaintiffs’ counsel agree that 13 the law firms of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (“Robbins Geller”), Barnow and 14 Associates P.C. (“Barnow”) and Gardy & Notis, LLP (“Gardy Notis”) be appointed Plaintiffs’ 15 Co-Lead Counsel; 16 WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendant in the above-referenced actions have 17 met and conferred, and Defendant supports this motion for consolidation and takes no position 18 on Plaintiffs’ motion for appointment of Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel; 19 WHEREAS, the agreed-upon schedule set forth below is not intended for the purpose of 20 delay, will not cause prejudice to any party, and will promote judicial efficiency. 21 THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiffs and Defendant, 22 through their respective counsel of record, as follows: 23 CONSOLIDATION OF ACTIONS 24 25 26 1 An administrative motion to relate the Balassone action to the Fazio action pursuant to Local Rules 3-12(b) and 7-11 was filed on March 26, 2012 in the Balassone action (Dkt. No. 4). 27 28 696614_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND APPOINTING PLAINTIFFS’ CO-LEAD COUNSEL - 12-cv-01127 -3- 1 1. The following actions are hereby consolidated for all purposes, including pretrial 2 proceedings, trial and appeal: 3 Abbreviated Case Name Case Number Date Filed 4 Fazio v. Apple Inc., a California corporation 12-cv-01127 March 6, 2012 5 Balassone v. Apple, Inc., and DOES 1-100 March 20, 2012 12-cv-01384 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2. The caption of this consolidated action shall be “In Re iPhone 4S Consumer Litigation,” and the files of this consolidated action shall be maintained in one file, under Master File No. 12-cv-01127. Any other actions now pending in, later filed in, or transferred to this Court which arise out of, or are related to, the same facts as alleged in the above-referenced cases shall be consolidated for all purposes, if and when they are brought to the Court’s attention. 3. Every pleading filed in this consolidated action, or in any separate action included herein, shall bear the following caption: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN JOSE DIVISION 16 17 IN RE IPHONE 4S CONSUMER ) ) LITIGATION 18 ______________________________________ ) ) 19 ) This Document Relates To: 20 Master File No. 12-cv-01127 21 22 4. When a pleading is intended to be applicable to all actions governed by this 23 Order, the words “All Actions” shall appear immediately after the words “This Document 24 Relates To:” in the above-referenced caption. When a pleading is intended to be applicable to 25 only some, but not all, of the consolidated actions, this Court’s docket number for each 26 individual action to which the pleading is intended to be applicable and the abbreviated case 27 name of said action shall appear immediately after the words “This Document Relates To:” in 28 696614_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND APPOINTING PLAINTIFFS’ CO-LEAD COUNSEL - 12-cv-01127 -4- 1 the above-referenced caption (e.g., “No. 12-cv-01127, Fazio v. Apple Inc., a California 2 corporation”). 3 5. A Master Docket and a Master File are hereby established for the above 4 consolidated proceedings, and for all other related cases filed in or transferred to this Court. 5 Separate dockets shall continue to be maintained for each of the individual actions hereby 6 consolidated, and entries shall be made in the docket of each individual case in accordance with 7 the regular procedures of the clerk of this Court, except as modified by this Order. 8 6. When a pleading is filed and the caption shows that it is applicable to “All 9 Actions,” the clerk shall file such pleading in the Master File and note such filing on the Master 10 Docket. No further copies need be filed, and no other docket entries need be made. 11 7. When a pleading is filed and the caption shows that it is to be applicable to fewer 12 than all of the consolidated actions, the clerk will file such pleading in the Master File only but 13 shall docket such filing on the Master Docket and the docket of each applicable action. 14 8. When a case which properly belongs as part of In re iPhone 4S Consumer 15 Litigation is filed in this Court or transferred to this Court from another court, the clerk of this 16 Court shall: 17 (a) Place a copy of this Order in the separate file for such action; 18 (b) Mail to the attorneys for the plaintiff(s) in the newly-filed or transferred 19 case a copy of this Order and direct that this Order be served upon or mailed to any new 20 defendant(s) or their counsel in the newly-filed or transferred case; and 21 (c) Make an appropriate entry on the Master Docket. This Court requests the 22 assistance of counsel in calling to the attention of the clerk of this Court the filing or transfer of 23 any case which properly might be consolidated as part of In re iPhone 4S Consumer Litigation. 24 25 ORGANIZATION OF PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL 9. The organizational structure of plaintiffs’ counsel established by this Order shall 26 bind plaintiffs’ counsel in the consolidated action, including any action subsequently governed 27 by this Order. 28 696614_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND APPOINTING PLAINTIFFS’ CO-LEAD COUNSEL - 12-cv-01127 -5- 1 10. The Court appoints the following law firms to act on behalf of plaintiffs in the 2 consolidated actions, including any plaintiffs subsequently governed by this Order, with the 3 responsibilities hereinafter prescribed. 4 (a) As Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel: 5 1. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP 6 2. Barnow and Associates, P.C. 7 3. Gardy & Notis, LLP 8 11. Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel shall have day-to-day responsibility for the conduct 9 of the consolidated litigation; shall determine how to prosecute the case and shall initiate, 10 coordinate and supervise the efforts of plaintiffs’ counsel in the consolidated action in the areas 11 of discovery, briefing, trial and settlement. 12 12. Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel may delegate responsibility for specific tasks to other 13 plaintiffs’ counsel in the consolidated action in a manner to assure that pretrial preparation is 14 conducted effectively, efficiently and economically; shall assist in maintaining communication 15 among counsel; and shall monitor the activities of plaintiffs’ counsel to assure that schedules are 16 met and unnecessary expenditures of time and money are avoided. Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel 17 shall maintain the official service list of all plaintiffs and plaintiffs’ counsel in the consolidated 18 action, including their addresses. Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel shall perform whatever any 19 additional functions that may be assigned to them by the Court. Agreements reached between 20 Defendant and Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel are binding on all plaintiffs and their counsel. No 21 discovery shall be served, and no motion shall be filed, by any plaintiffs’ counsel without the 22 consent of Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel, unless leave of Court is obtained. 23 13. Service of all papers filed with the Court shall be accomplished by e-filing, and 24 no other type of service shall be required. Service of all papers that are not filed with the Court 25 shall be accomplished by plaintiffs serving defendant’s counsel, and by defendant serving 26 Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel, as applicable, by either: (i) overnight mail service; (ii) telecopier or 27 (iii) hand delivery. Whenever feasible, the serving party shall send courtesy copies 28 696614_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND APPOINTING PLAINTIFFS’ CO-LEAD COUNSEL - 12-cv-01127 -6- 1 simultaneously via e-mail in PDF format, to Defendant’s counsel or to Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead 2 Counsel, as applicable. 3 4 SCHEDULE 14. Plaintiffs shall file a Master Consolidated Complaint within 14 days of the date 5 this Order is entered. Defendant need not respond to the Fazio or Balassone complaints already 6 filed or any other case which is subsequently consolidated herein. 7 15. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Master Consolidated 8 Complaint within 30 days of service thereof. In the event that Defendant files and serves any 9 motion directed at the Master Consolidated Complaint, the parties shall meet and confer to 10 determine an appropriate briefing schedule, which shall be presented to the Court for approval. 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 12 DATED: March 26, 2012 13 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP SHAWN A. WILLIAMS 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 s/ Shawn A. Williams SHAWN A. WILLIAMS Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP ROBERT M. ROTHMAN 58 South Service Road, Suite 200 Melville, NY 11747 Telephone: 631/367-7100 631/367-1173 (fax) 23 24 25 26 27 28 696614_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND APPOINTING PLAINTIFFS’ CO-LEAD COUNSEL - 12-cv-01127 -7- ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP PAUL J. GELLER STUART A. DAVIDSON MARK DEARMAN KATHLEEN BARBER 120 E. Palmetto Park Road, Suite 500 Boca Raton, FL 33432 Telephone: 561/750-3000 561/750-3364 (fax) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Counsel for Plaintiff Frank M. Fazio and [Proposed] Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 8 9 DATED: March 26, 2012 10 BARNOW AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. BEN BARNOW ERICH P. SCHORK 11 s/ Ben Barnow BEN BARNOW 12 13 One North LaSalle Street, Suite 4600 Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: 312/621-2000 312/641-5504 (fax) 14 15 Counsel for Plaintiff Frank M. Fazio and [Proposed] Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 16 17 18 19 DATED: March 26, 2012 GARDY & NOTIS, LLP JAMES S. NOTIS JENNIFER SARNELLI (State Bar No. 242510) 20 21 22 23 24 s/ Jennifer Sarnelli JENNIFER SARNELLI 501 Fifth Avenue, Suite, 1408 New York, NY 10017 Telephone: 212/905-0509 212/905-0508 (fax) 25 26 27 28 696614_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND APPOINTING PLAINTIFFS’ CO-LEAD COUNSEL - 12-cv-01127 -8- 1 GARDY & NOTIS, LLP CHARLES A. GERMERSHAUSEN 560 Sylvan Avenue, Suite 3085 Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632 Telephone: 201/567-7377 201/567-7337 (fax) 2 3 4 5 Counsel for Plaintiffs Daniel Balassone & Benjamin Swartzman and [Proposed] Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 6 7 I, Shawn A. Williams, am the ECF User whose ID and the password are being used to 8 9 file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND 10 APPOINTING PLAINTIFFS’ CO-LEAD COUNSEL. In compliance with General Order 45, 11 X.B., I hereby attest that Ben Barnow, Jennifer Sarnelli and Gail Lees have concurred in this 12 filing. 13 s/ Shawn A. Williams SHAWN A. WILLIAMS 14 15 16 * 17 18 19 * * ORDER Having considered the parties’ Stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ Stipulation. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Except that the case is in the Oakland Division, not 21 the San Jose Division. 22 3/29/2012 23 DATED: ___________________________ 24 ____________________________________ CLAUDIA R. LLOYD THE HONORABLE HOWARDWILKEN DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 696614_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND APPOINTING PLAINTIFFS’ CO-LEAD COUNSEL - 12-cv-01127 -9- 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on March 26, 2012, I authorized the electronic filing of the foregoing 3 with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing 4 to the e-mail addresses denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify 5 6 7 8 that I caused to be mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non-CM/ECF participants indicated on the attached Manual Notice List. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 9 foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 26, 2012. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 696614_1 s/ Shawn A. Williams SHAWN A. WILLIAMS ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) E-mail: shawnw@rgrdlaw.com CAND-ECF- Page 1 of 1 Mailing Information for a Case 5:12-cv-01127-HRL Electronic Mail Notice List The following are those who are currently on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case. Mark Jeffrey Dearman mdearman@rgrdlaw.com Paul J. Geller pgeller@rgrdlaw.com Benjamin Matthew Glickman bglickman@gibsondunn.com,mmccrory@gibsondunn.com Gail E. Lees glees@gibsondunn.com,jwalker@gibsondunn.com,wlamb@gibsondunn.com,jjessen@gibsondunn.com Robert M. Rothman rrothman@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_ny@rgrdlaw.com Erich Paul Schork e.schork@barnowlaw.com Shawn A. Williams shawnw@rgrdlaw.com,khuang@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com,nnewton@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sf@rgrdlaw.com Manual Notice List The following is the list of attorneys who are not on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case (who therefore require manual noticing). You may wish to use your mouse to select and copy this list into your word processing program in order to create notices or labels for these recipients. Kathleen L. Barber Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP 120 East Palmetto Park Road Suite 500 Boca Raton, FL 33432 Ben Barnow Barnow and Associates P.C. One N. LaSalle Street Suite 4600 Chicago, IL 60602 Stuart A. Davidson Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP 120 E. Palmetto Park Road Suite 500 Boca Raton, FL 33432-4809 Matthew S. Kahn Gibson Dunn and Crutcher 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105 https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/MailList.pl?265790262043177-L_1_0-1 3/26/2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?