Cascades Computer Innovation LLC v. RPX Corporation et al

Filing 129

ORDER ENTERING STIPULATION AS ORDER re 128 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL filed by Cascades Computer Innovation LLC, Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.; Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. terminated; and SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARI NG. Compliance set for Friday, 2/14/2014 09:01 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Separate Statements filed by 2/7/2014. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/5/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 CASCADES COMPUTER INNOVATION LLC, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 vs. Case No.: 12-CV-1143 YGR ORDER ENTERING STIPULATION AS ORDER; REQUIRING STATUS STATEMENT; SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING RPX CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 16 17 On January 31, 2014, Plaintiff Cascades Computer Innovation LLC and Defendant Motorola 18 Mobility stipulated to the latter's dismissal from this action. (Dkt. No. 128.) The Court ENTERS the 19 parties' stipulation as the Order of this Court. 20 The Court takes judicial notice of the fact that this stipulation follows the January 2, 2014 21 issuance of a claim construction order by Judge Kennelly in associated patent litigation proceeding 22 in the Northern District of Illinois. (N.D. Ill. Case No. 1:11-cv-04574, Dkt. No. 141.) On January 23 30, 2014, Cascades and Motorola filed in the Illinois action's docket a stipulated dismissal 24 substantially identical to the one filed before this Court. (N.D. Ill. Case No. 1:11-cv-04574, Dkt. 25 No. 145.) 26 In view of these developments, the Court ORDERS the remaining parties in the above-styled 27 action to file separate status statements apprising the Court of their positions on how Judge 28 Kennelly's claim construction order has affected the posture of the litigation before this Court and 1 whether the developments in the Illinois action have affected the parties' views on staying the instant 2 antitrust action, as expressed in their responses to the Court's Order to Show Cause of December 3, 3 2013. (Dkt. Nos. 119 (Order to Show Cause), 122 (Plaintiff's Response), 123 (Defendants' Joint 4 Reply).) 5 The parties' separate status statements shall be filed in accordance with Civil Local Rule 3-4; 6 shall not exceed four pages in length, exclusive of any exhibits; and shall be filed no later than 7 Friday, February 7, 2014. 8 9 The Court SETS a compliance hearing in this matter for its 9:01 a.m. Calendar on Friday, February 14, 2014, in Courtroom 5 of the United States Courthouse located at 1301 Clay Street in Oakland, California. If the parties' separate status statements have been filed timely, the compliance 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 hearing shall be vacated and no appearance shall be required. Failure to comply may result in 12 sanctions. 13 This Order terminates Docket No. 128. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 17 Date: February 5, 2014 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?