Cascades Computer Innovation LLC v. RPX Corporation et al

Filing 129

ORDER ENTERING STIPULATION AS ORDER re 128 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL filed by Cascades Computer Innovation LLC, Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.; Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. terminated; and SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARI NG. Compliance set for Friday, 2/14/2014 09:01 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Separate Statements filed by 2/7/2014. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/5/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

CASCADES COMPUTER INNOVATION LLC,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15

vs.

Case No.: 12-CV-1143 YGR
ORDER ENTERING STIPULATION AS ORDER;
REQUIRING STATUS STATEMENT; SETTING
COMPLIANCE HEARING

RPX CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On January 31, 2014, Plaintiff Cascades Computer Innovation LLC and Defendant Motorola

18

Mobility stipulated to the latter's dismissal from this action. (Dkt. No. 128.) The Court ENTERS the

19

parties' stipulation as the Order of this Court.

20

The Court takes judicial notice of the fact that this stipulation follows the January 2, 2014

21

issuance of a claim construction order by Judge Kennelly in associated patent litigation proceeding

22

in the Northern District of Illinois. (N.D. Ill. Case No. 1:11-cv-04574, Dkt. No. 141.) On January

23

30, 2014, Cascades and Motorola filed in the Illinois action's docket a stipulated dismissal

24

substantially identical to the one filed before this Court. (N.D. Ill. Case No. 1:11-cv-04574, Dkt.

25

No. 145.)

26

In view of these developments, the Court ORDERS the remaining parties in the above-styled

27

action to file separate status statements apprising the Court of their positions on how Judge

28

Kennelly's claim construction order has affected the posture of the litigation before this Court and

1

whether the developments in the Illinois action have affected the parties' views on staying the instant

2

antitrust action, as expressed in their responses to the Court's Order to Show Cause of December 3,

3

2013. (Dkt. Nos. 119 (Order to Show Cause), 122 (Plaintiff's Response), 123 (Defendants' Joint

4

Reply).)

5

The parties' separate status statements shall be filed in accordance with Civil Local Rule 3-4;

6

shall not exceed four pages in length, exclusive of any exhibits; and shall be filed no later than

7

Friday, February 7, 2014.

8
9

The Court SETS a compliance hearing in this matter for its 9:01 a.m. Calendar on Friday,
February 14, 2014, in Courtroom 5 of the United States Courthouse located at 1301 Clay Street in
Oakland, California. If the parties' separate status statements have been filed timely, the compliance

11

United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

hearing shall be vacated and no appearance shall be required. Failure to comply may result in

12

sanctions.

13

This Order terminates Docket No. 128.

14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
16
17

Date: February 5, 2014

_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2