Kaiser v. BMW of North America, LLC

Filing 82

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 80 Stipulation . The hearing regarding 76 is set for 11 a.m. on May 30, 2013. Any Opposition to the Motion must be filed by May 1, 2013. Any Reply to the Opposition must be filed by May 8, 2013.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 JEFFREY A. KAISER, 12 13 Plaintiff(s), v. 14 BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, 15 No. C-12-01311-DMR NOTICE AND ORDER SETTING HEARING ON DEFENDANT COUNCIL OF BETTER BUSINESS BUREAUS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ANTISLAPP MOTION [DOCKET NO. 76] Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 16 17 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 18 The court is in receipt of Defendant Council of Better Business Bureaus’ Motion for Leave 19 to File Anti-SLAPP Motion (“Motion”) [Docket No. 76] and the parties’ Stipulation and Proposed 20 Order to Shorten Time (“Proposed Order to Shorten Time”) [Docket No. 80]. The Proposed Order 21 to Shorten Time is DENIED. 22 You are hereby notified that a hearing regarding the dispute is set for 11 a.m. on May 30, 23 2013 at the U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 94612. For courtroom 24 number and floor information, please check the Court’s on-line calendar at 25 http://www.cand.uscourts.gov (click “Calendars - Judges' Weekly Calendars” link, then select Judge 26 Ryu’s calendar). Any Opposition to the Motion must be filed by May 1, 2013. Any Reply to the 27 Opposition must be filed by May 8, 2013. 28 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 24, 2013 3 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?