Guidiville Rancheria of California et al v. United States Of America et al

Filing 252

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/3/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

BRUCE REED GOODMILLER (CA SBN 121491)
City Attorney
Email: [e-mail]
RACHEL SOMMOVILLA (CA SBN 231529)
Assistant City Attorney
Email: [e-mail]
CITY OF RICHMOND
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, California 94804
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 510.620.6518
ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490)
E-mail: [e-mail]
CHRISTOPHER J. CARR (CA SBN 184076)
E-mail: [e-mail]
NAVI DHILLON (CA SBN 279537)
E-mail: [e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
THE CITY OF RICHMOND

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

OAKLAND DIVISION

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

THE GUIDIVILLE RANCHERIA OF
CALIFORNIA, a federally recognized Indian
Tribe; and UPSTREAM POINT MOLATE LLC,
a California Limited Liability Corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No.

CV 12-1326-YGR

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR
OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
Judge: The Honorable Yvonne González
Rogers

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
SALLY JEWELL, the Secretary of the
Department of the Interior; KEVIN
WASHBURN, the Assistant Secretary - Indian
Affairs; and THE CITY OF RICHMOND, a
California Municipality,
Defendants.
Caption continues next page

28
CASE NO. CV 12-1326-YGR
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
sf-3487321

1
2
3
4
5

THE CITY OF RICHMOND, a California
Municipality,
Counterclaimant,
v.
UPSTREAM POINT MOLATE LLC, a
California Limited Liability Corporation,

6

Counterclaim Defendant.

7
8
9

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
The Court, having granted defendant and cross-complainant The City of Richmond’s

10

(“City”) motion for judgment on pleadings, now renders judgment in favor of the City and against

11

plaintiff and counterclaim defendant Upstream Point Molate LLC (“Upstream”) and plaintiff The

12

Guidiville Rancheria of California (a/k/a the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians of the Guidiville

13

Rancheria) (together, “Plaintiffs”) on all claims asserted by Plaintiffs in their Third Amended

14

Complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiffs shall take nothing from the City on the claims set forth in

15

their Third Amended Complaint.

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED.

18
19
20
21

February 3, 2015

Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. CV 12-1326-YGR
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
sf-3487321

1