Guidiville Rancheria of California et al v. United States Of America et al

Filing 420

ORDER RE ANTICIPATED REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/19/21. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2021)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 GUIDIVILLE RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Plaintiffs, 7 vs. CASE NO. 12-1326-YGR ORDER RE ANTICIPATED REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 8 9 CITY OF RICHMOND, Defendant. 10 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 11 United States District Court Northern District of California The Court was advised that a request for a temporary restraining order was to be filed 12 imminently. In light of that information, the Court convened an informal conference over the 13 Zoom webinar platform. Scott Crowell appeared on behalf of plaintiff Guidiville Rancheria of 14 California, Garet O’Keefe on behalf of Upstream Point Molate, LLC, and Amy Hoyt appeared 15 specially on behalf of the defendant City of Richmond. 16 The Court anticipates that the plaintiffs will file and serve their papers today. One request 17 is that the City be enjoined from filing on Monday, November 22, 2021 its anticipated letter to the 18 Court of Appeal. The City confirmed that, other than to put plaintiffs on notice of its position with 19 the pending appeal, no other material issue exists for the November 22, 2021 filing date. 20 Accordingly, the Court sets a hearing on this matter for Monday, November 22, 2021 at 21 10:00 a.m. Until the Court finds otherwise, the City shall not file its letter with the Ninth Circuit 22 but shall serve the letter on plaintiffs to provide plaintiffs with notice of the City’s position. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 19, 2021 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?