Johnson v. Astrue

Filing 27

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 1/16/2013. Signed by Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/2/2013. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 GREGORY MARCELL JOHNSON, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 v. No. C 12-1580 PJH ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 8 9 On October 22, 2012, the court entered an order directing the parties to inform the 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Defendant. ______________________________/ court whether they consent to proceed before a magistrate judge for all purposes, including 12 entry of judgment. The parties were directed to file a consent or declination by November 13 5, 2012. Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel Robert Weems, failed to comply with the 14 court’s order and has not filed either a consent or declination to proceed before a 15 magistrate judge. 16 It is hereby ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this order, Plaintiff 17 must file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge and must show 18 cause in writing why she failed to file timely a consent or declination. Plaintiff is advised 19 that if she fails to respond to this court’s order and fails to comply in a timely manner, she 20 may be subject to sanctions, including terminating sanctions. The court further notes that 21 this is the second order to show cause issued to plaintiff in this case for failure to comply 22 with court deadlines. See October 4, 2012 Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff’s counsel may 23 be subject to sanctions or other disciplinary action pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-6. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 2, 2013 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?