Johnson v. Astrue
Filing
27
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 1/16/2013. Signed by Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/2/2013. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
GREGORY MARCELL JOHNSON,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
v.
No. C 12-1580 PJH
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner
of Social Security,
8
9
On October 22, 2012, the court entered an order directing the parties to inform the
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Defendant.
______________________________/
court whether they consent to proceed before a magistrate judge for all purposes, including
12
entry of judgment. The parties were directed to file a consent or declination by November
13
5, 2012. Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel Robert Weems, failed to comply with the
14
court’s order and has not filed either a consent or declination to proceed before a
15
magistrate judge.
16
It is hereby ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this order, Plaintiff
17
must file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge and must show
18
cause in writing why she failed to file timely a consent or declination. Plaintiff is advised
19
that if she fails to respond to this court’s order and fails to comply in a timely manner, she
20
may be subject to sanctions, including terminating sanctions. The court further notes that
21
this is the second order to show cause issued to plaintiff in this case for failure to comply
22
with court deadlines. See October 4, 2012 Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff’s counsel may
23
be subject to sanctions or other disciplinary action pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-6.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: January 2, 2013
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?