De Leon et al v. NCR Corporation
STIPULATION AND ORDER, Case referred to Private ADR.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 1/15/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO. C12-01637SBA
RON DE LEON and ERNESTO
FAJARDO, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated and on
behalf of the general public,
NCR Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached
the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Private mediation with Mark
S. Rudy (currently scheduled for April 16, 2013).
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline – May 1, 2013
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE Dated: 1/14/13 ___
_______________ /s/ Eric A. Grover
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: 1/14/13 _____
/s/ Tracy L. Scheidtmann
Attorney for Defendant
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?