De Leon et al v. NCR Corporation

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Case referred to Private ADR.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 1/15/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2013)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. C12-01637SBA RON DE LEON and ERNESTO FAJARDO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiff(s), v. NCR Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Defendant(s). / Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes:  Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)  Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)  Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process:  Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Private mediation with Mark S. Rudy (currently scheduled for April 16, 2013). The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:  the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )  other requested deadline – May 1, 2013 CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE Dated: 1/14/13 ___ _______________ /s/ Eric A. Grover Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: 1/14/13 _____ /s/ Tracy L. Scheidtmann Attorney for Defendant ORDER   The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:1/15/13 UNITED STATES JUDGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?