Smith v. Payne et al
Filing
17
ORDER Setting Case Management Conference after reassignment. Case Management Statement due by 9/5/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/12/2012 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 7/13/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
GWENDOLYN SMITH
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff(s),
v.
12
PAUL PAYNE, et al.,
13
No. C-12-01732-DMR
ORDER SETTING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE
JUDGE DONNA M. RYU
[Reassigned Case]
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
14
15
16
17
18
19
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The above-entitled matter having been reassigned to the Honorable Donna M. Ryu for trial
and all further proceedings,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 and Civil L.R.16-10, that a Case
20
Management Conference shall be held in this case before the Honorable Donna M. Ryu on
21
September 12, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street,
22
Oakland, California.
23
No later than August 22, 2012, the parties shall (1) meet and confer regarding Fed.R.Civ.P.
24
26 initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and a discovery plan; (2) file an ADR
25
Certification (form available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov) signed by the parties and counsel
26
pursuant to A.D.R. L.R. 3-5(b); and (3) file either a Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need
27
for ADR Phone Conference (form available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov) pursuant to ADR L.R.
28
3-5(b) & (c).
1
2
No later than September 5, 2012, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement
in conformance with Judge Ryu's attached Standing Order.
3
Each attorney of record in all “E-Filing” cases is obligated to become an ECF User
4
and be assigned a user ID and password for access to the system upon designation of the action as
5
being subject to ECF. Registration shall be on a form prescribed by the Clerk. Attorneys of record
6
who fail to register timely shall be subject to such sanctions as may be imposed by the Court.
7
STANDING ORDER FOR
MAGISTRATE JUDGE DONNA M. RYU
(Revised July 3, 2012)
8
9
Parties shall comply with the procedures in the Federal Rules of Civil or Criminal Procedure,
the Northern District of California’s Local Rules and General Orders, and this standing order, all of
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
which are available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. Failure to comply with any of the rules or
12
orders may be grounds for monetary sanctions, dismissal, entry of judgment, or other appropriate
13
sanctions.
14
CALENDAR DATES AND SCHEDULING
15
1.
16
or during the regular criminal calendar when Judge Ryu is on criminal calendar duty. Civil motions
17
are heard on the second and fourth Thursdays of the month at 11:00 a.m. Civil case management
18
conferences are heard on Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. Civil pretrial conferences are heard on
19
Wednesdays at 3:00 p.m.
20
2.
21
Parties need not reserve a hearing date, but should confirm the court’s availability at
22
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. The court may reset hearing dates as the court’s calendar requires.
23
3.
24
637-3639.
25
26
27
28
Criminal motions are heard on the second and fourth Thursdays of the month at 11:00 a.m.,
Parties must notice motions (other than discovery motions) pursuant to the local rules.
For scheduling questions, please call Judge Ryu’s courtroom deputy, Ivy Garcia, at (510)
1
CONSENT CASES
2
4.
3
a written consent to the assignment of a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes, or written
4
declination of consent, as soon as possible. If a party files a dispositive motion (such as a motion to
5
dismiss or a motion for remand), the moving party must file the consent or declination
6
simultaneously with the motion. In no event shall the consent or declination be filed later than the
7
deadlines specified in Civil L.R. 73-1(a)(1) and (2).
8
9
In civil cases that are randomly assigned to Judge Ryu for all purposes, each party should file
CHAMBERS COPIES AND PROPOSED ORDERS
5.
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7) and 5-2(b), parties must lodge an extra paper copy of certain
filings and mark it as a copy for “Chambers.” Please three-hole punch the chambers copy and
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
submit it to the Oakland Clerk’s Office.
12
6.
13
to dmrpo@cand.uscourts.gov as a word processing attachment on the same day the document is e-
14
filed. This address should only be used for this stated purpose unless otherwise directed by the
15
court.
16
Any stipulation or proposed order submitted by an e-filing party shall be submitted by email
CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT
17
7.
18
shall file a Joint Case Management Statement in full compliance with the Court's Standing Order for
19
All Judges of the Northern District of California governing “Contents of Joint Case Management
20
Statement,” available on the Court’s website.
21
8.
22
approval. Each party shall be represented in person at the Case Management Conference by lead
23
trial counsel (or a party if in pro se), who shall be (1) prepared to address all of the matters referred
24
to in the Northern District of California’s standing order on Joint Case Management Statements; and
25
(2) have full authority to enter stipulations and make admissions pursuant to that order. Permission
26
for a party to attend by telephone may be granted, in the court's discretion, upon written request
27
made at least one week in advance of the hearing if the court determines that good cause exists to
28
excuse personal attendance, and that personal attendance is not needed in order to have an effective
No later than seven days before the initial case management or status conference, the parties
Parties may not stipulate to continue a case management or pretrial conference without court
conference. The facts establishing good cause must be set forth in the request.
3
1
9.
2
reporter unless counsel requests a court reporter in advance.
All case management conferences are audio recorded. They are not reported by a court
3
CIVIL DISCOVERY
4
Discovery Disputes
5
10.
6
the court uses the following procedure. The parties shall not file formal discovery motions. Instead,
7
as required by the federal and local rules, the parties shall first meet and confer to try to resolve their
8
disagreements. The meet and confer session must be in person or by telephone, and may not be
9
conducted by letter, e-mail, or fax. If disagreements remain, the parties shall file a joint letter no
In order to respond to discovery disputes in a flexible, cost-effective and efficient manner,
later than five business days after the meet and confer session, unless otherwise directed by the
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
court. Lead trial counsel for both parties must sign the letter, which shall include an attestation
12
that the parties met and conferred in person or by telephone regarding all issues prior to filing the
13
letter. Going issue-by-issue, the joint letter shall describe each unresolved issue, summarize each
14
party’s position with appropriate legal authority; and provide each party’s final proposed
15
compromise before moving to the next issue. The joint letter shall not exceed ten pages without
16
leave of court. Parties are expected to plan for and cooperate in preparing the joint letter so
17
that each side has adequate time to address the arguments. In the rare instance that a joint letter
18
is not possible, each side may submit a letter not to exceed four pages, which shall include an
19
explanation of why a joint letter was not possible. The parties shall submit one exhibit to the letter
20
that only sets forth each disputed discovery request in full, followed immediately by the objections
21
and/or responses thereto. No other information shall be included in any such exhibit. No other
22
exhibits shall be submitted without prior approval by the court. The court will review the
23
submission(s) and determine whether formal briefing or proceedings are necessary. Discovery
24
letter briefs must be e-filed under the Civil Events category of Motions and Related Filings >
25
Motions - General > "Discovery Letter Brief".
26
11.
27
and beneficial for counsel to appear in person. This provides the opportunity, where appropriate, to
28
engage counsel in resolving aspects of the discovery dispute while remaining available to rule on
In the event that a discovery hearing is ordered, the court has found that it is often efficient
4
1
any disputes that counsel are not able to resolve. For this reason, the court expects counsel to appear
2
in person. Permission for a party to attend by telephone may be granted, in the court's discretion,
3
upon written request made at least one week in advance of the hearing if the court determines that
4
good cause exists to excuse personal attendance, and that personal attendance is not needed in order
5
to have an effective discovery hearing. The facts establishing good cause must be set forth in the
6
request.
7
12.
8
good faith attempts to resolve disputed issues, seek judicial intervention pursuant to Civil L.R. 37-
9
1(b) by contacting the court through the courtroom deputy. If the court is unavailable, the discovery
In emergencies during discovery events (such as depositions), any party may, after exhausting
event shall proceed with objections noted for the record.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Privilege Logs
12
13.
13
privileged or otherwise protected from discovery, that party shall promptly prepare and provide a
14
privilege log that is sufficiently detailed and informative for the opposing party to assess whether a
15
document’s designation as privileged is justified. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5). The privilege log shall
16
set forth the privilege relied upon and specify separately for each document or for each category of
17
similarly situated documents:
If a party withholds information that is responsive to a discovery request by claiming that it is
18
(a) the title and description of the document, including number of pages or Bates-number
19
range;
20
(b) the subject matter addressed in the document;
21
(c) the identity and position of its author(s);
22
(d) the identity and position of all addressees and recipients;
23
(e) the date the document was prepared and, if different, the date(s) on which it was sent to or
24
shared with persons other than its author(s); and
25
(f) the specific basis for the claim that the document is privileged or protected.
26
Communications involving trial counsel that post-date the filing of the complaint need not be placed
27
on a privilege log. Failure to furnish this information promptly may be deemed a waiver of the
28
privilege or protection.
5
1
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
2
14.
3
facts not in dispute by citations to admissible evidence. If the parties are unable to reach complete
4
agreement after meeting and conferring, they shall file a joint statement of the undisputed facts about
5
which they do agree. Separate statements of undisputed facts shall not be filed and will not be
6
considered by the court.
Motions for summary judgment shall be accompanied by a joint statement of the material
7
UNREPRESENTED (PRO SE) PARTIES
Lawyer” on the Court’s homepage, www.cand.uscourts.gov. The link discusses the Court’s “Legal
10
Help Center” for unrepresented parties which is located on the 15th floor, room 2796, of the United
11
For the Northern District of California
15.
9
United States District Court
8
States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco.
Parties representing themselves should visit the Quick Link titled “If You Don’t Have a
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
15
______________________________
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?