Smith v. Payne et al
Filing
32
ORDER re 26 Letter filed by Paul Payne, Santa Rosa Press Democrat. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/21/2012. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
GWENDOLYN SMITH, et al.,
11
Plaintiffs,
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’
SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 LETTER
v.
12
PAUL PAYNE, et al.,
13
Defendants.
___________________________________/
14
15
The court is in receipt of Defendants’ September 13, 2012 letter in which Defendants ask the
16
court to continue the October 17, 2012 Case Management Conference and vacate the parties’ Rule
17
26 obligations, in light of a special motion to strike that Defendants anticipate filing. [Docket No.
18
26.] The court reminds Defendants that such a request should have been made through a
19
properly-noticed administrative motion pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11. The court declines to
20
continue the deadlines in this case based solely upon the representation by a party that it is planning
21
to file a motion at some unspecified time, and that the party believes the motion will be successful
22
and dispositive of the case. Should the court determine that an adjustment in the case schedule is
23
appropriate upon the filing of any motion by either party, the court will issue an order to that effect.
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
u
RT
FO
a M. Ry
onn
Judge D
H
ER
R NIA
S
I
NO
28
ERED
ORD
T IS SO
LI
27
Dated: September 21, 2012
RT
U
O
25
26
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A
24
UNIT
ED
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 12-01732 DMR
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?