Salimi et al v. BMW Financial Services NA, LLC et al

Filing 90

FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/6/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2015)

Case4:12-cv-01754-JSW Document88 Filed02/03/15 Page1 of 7

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

OAKLAND DIVISION

9
10
11

MOHAMMAD SALIMI; AUGUST
GALARAGA, ALVIN LEUNG, and VELIA
SERRANO

Case No. 4:12-cv-01754 -JSW

[PROPOSED] FINAL ORDER AND
JUDGMENT

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiffs,
vs.

Date: February 6, 2015
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Dept: Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor
Hon. Jeffrey S. White

BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLC;
ALPHERA FINANCIAL SERVICES; MINI
FINANCIAL SERVICES; ROLLS-ROYCE
MOTOR CARS FINANCIAL SERVICES;
ASSET ACQUISITION GROUP, LLC;
INVESTMENT RETRIEVERS, INC.; and
DOES 1-50, inclusive,
Defendants

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[Proposed] Final Order and Judgment (Revised 150121)

Case4:12-cv-01754-JSW Document88 Filed02/03/15 Page2 of 7

1

THIS MATTER HAVING come before the Court for a hearing on February 6, 2015

2

pursuant to the motion filed to determine whether the Settlement Agreement between the named

3

Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”), MOHAMMAD SALIMI, AUGUST GALARAGA, and ALVIN LEUNG,

4

individually and on behalf of the proposed Settlement Class (“Class”), and Defendants BMW

5

FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLC, ALPHERA FINANCIAL SERVICES, MINI FINANCIAL

6

SERVICES, ROLLS-ROYCE MOTOR CARS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INVESTMENT

7

RETRIEVERS, INC, and ASSET ACQUISITION GROUP, LLC, (collectively "BMW

8

FINANCIAL SERVICES") is fair and reasonable and should be approved as being in the best

9

interests of the Class, and for the purpose of determining attorneys’ fees and costs to be awarded,

10

Notice of the hearing, the Settlement and application for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of

11

expenses having been given pursuant to the Settlement and as set forth in this Court’s Preliminary

12

Approval Order of September 29, 2014 and Proof of Notice having been filed with the Court, all

13

persons present or represented at the hearing, who were entitled to be heard pursuant to the Notice,

14

having been given an opportunity to be heard, Counsel for the parties having appeared in support of

15

the Settlement, and The Court having considered all documents filed in support of the Settlement

16

and fully considered all matters raised, all exhibits and affidavits filed and all evidence received at

17

the hearing, all other papers and documents comprising the record herein, and all oral arguments

18

presented to the Court,

19

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED on this 6th day of February, 2015, that:

20

This Final Judgment incorporates the Settlement Agreement, and the capitalized terms used

21

in this Order shall have the meanings and/or definitions given to them in the Settlement Agreement,

22

as submitted to the Court with the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement.

23
24

This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over all parties to this
action, including all members of the Settlement Class as that term is defined herein.

25

This Court certifies this action, for settlement purposes only, as a Class Action.

26

The following Settlement Class, provisionally certified by the Court in its Order dated

27

September 29, 2014, is hereby certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 for settlement

28

purposes only, and is hereinafter referred to as the “Class”:
2
[Proposed] Final Order and Judgment (Revised 150121)

Case4:12-cv-01754-JSW Document88 Filed02/03/15 Page3 of 7

1

The phrase “Settlement Class” is defined as all persons who:

2

(a)

who purchased a motor vehicle and, as part of that transaction, entered into

3

an agreement subject to California’s Rees-Levering Automobile Sales

4

Finance Act, Civil Code § 2981, et seq.;

5

(b)

whose motor vehicle was repossessed or voluntarily surrendered;

6

(c)

who were sent a Statutory Notice by BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA,

7

LLC, ALPHERA FINANCIAL SERVICES, MINI FINANCIAL

8

SERVICES, or ROLLS-ROYCE MOTOR CARS FINANCIAL SERVICES,

9

at any time between September 6, 2008 and January 15, 2013; and

10

(d)

11

The “Settlement Class” excludes persons:

12

(a)

who filed for bankruptcy on or before January 15, 2013,

13

(b)

all deceased persons,

14

(c)

persons against whom BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES had obtained a

15

against whose account a deficiency balance was assessed.

judgment on or before January 15, 2013,

16

(d)

persons who have signed a release, and

17

(e)

out of state contacts or repossessions.

18
19

This Court finds on the record before it that the Class meets the requirements for class

20

certification for settlement purposes as the Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is

21

impracticable.

22

This Court finds on the record before it that the Class meets the requirement for class

23

certification for settlement purposes as questions of law or fact common to the issues to be

24

reviewed in connection with the Settlement predominate over the questions affecting only

25

individual members for the purpose of implementing the Settlement in accordance with the

26

Settlement Agreement.

27
28

This Court finds on the record before it that the Class meets the requirement for class
certification for settlement purposes as Plaintiffs’ claims are typical of the claims of the Class as a
3
[Proposed] Final Order and Judgment (Revised 150121)

Case4:12-cv-01754-JSW Document88 Filed02/03/15 Page4 of 7

1
2

whole.
This Court finds on the record before it, that the Class meets the requirements for class

3

certification for settlement purposes as Plaintiffs and their Class Counsel have adequately

4

represented and will continue to adequately represent and protect the interests of the Class.

5

This Court finds on the record before it that the Class is appropriate for certification for

6

settlement purposes as certification of the Class for settlement purposes only by this Court in this

7

action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the issues

8

before this Court at this time. Manageability issues do not prevent certification here because there

9

will be no trial.

10

The individual Notice by mail, given to each member of the Class at updated mailing

11

addresses, constitutes the best notice practicable and is in full compliance with the requirements of

12

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and due process of law.

13

This Court finds that the Settlement and the Settlement Agreement are the product of arm’s

14

length negotiations between the parties and that the terms thereof are fair, reasonable, adequate, and

15

in the best interests of the Class and are therefore approved and incorporated herein by the Court.

16

The Settlement and Settlement Agreement should be implemented and consummated in

17

accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. To the extent already implemented by the

18

parties, such implementation is hereby approved and ratified by the Court.

19

Upon the Effective Date of Settlement, Plaintiffs and all Settlement Class Members and

20

their heirs, executors, estates, predecessors, successors, assigns, agents and representatives shall be

21

deemed to have jointly and severally released and forever discharged BMW FINANCIAL

22

SERVICES from any and all Released Claims as that term is defined in the Settlement Agreement.

23

Settlement Class Members expressly waive and relinquish any and all rights and benefits

24

which they may have under, or which may be conferred upon them by, the provisions of §1542 of

25

the Civil Code, as set forth in the Settlement Agreement.

26

The terms of the Agreement and this Judgment shall be forever binding on, and shall have

27

res judicata effect in any pending or future lawsuits or proceedings that may be brought or

28

maintained by or on behalf of any Class Members. This Court hereby bars and enjoins: (i) All
4
[Proposed] Final Order and Judgment (Revised 150121)

Case4:12-cv-01754-JSW Document88 Filed02/03/15 Page5 of 7

1

Class Members, and all persons acting on behalf of, or in concert or participation with, such Class

2

Members, from filing, commencing, prosecuting, intervening in, or participating in, any lawsuit in

3

any jurisdiction on behalf of any Class Member, based upon or asserting any of the Released

4

Claims; and (ii) All Class Members, and all persons acting on behalf of or in concert or

5

participation with such Class Members, from bringing a class action on behalf of Class Members or

6

seeking to certify a class which includes such Class Members, in any lawsuit based upon or

7

asserting any of the Released Claims.

8

Attached to this Judgment as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct list of all Class Members who

9

timely submitted Requests for Exclusion. No Class Members, other than those listed in Exhibit 1,

10

are excluded from the Class, or from the effect of this Judgment.

11

It is expressly determined that there is no just reason for delay and the entry of this

12

Judgment expressly is hereby directed. In the event that this Judgment is appealed, its mandate will

13

automatically be stayed until and unless the Judgment is affirmed in its entirety by the court of last

14

resort to which such appeal(s) has (have) been taken and such affirmance is no longer subject to

15

further appeal or review.

16
17

This Final Order and Judgment is final for purposes of appeal and may be appealed, and the
Clerk is hereby directed to enter Judgment thereon.
Attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses to counsel for the Class in the amount of

18
19

428,105.23
$_______________, plus an incentive payment of $3,500.00 to MOHAMMAD SALIMI,

20

AUGUSTO GALARAGA and VELIA SERRANO each, and an incentive payment of $1,000.00 to

21

ALVIN LEUNG is hereby approved as fair and reasonable and BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES

22

shall make such payments in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

23
24

Any and all objections to the Settlement and the Settlement Agreement are overruled as
being without merit.

25

In the event that the Settlement does not become effective in accordance with the terms of

26

the Settlement Agreement, then this Judgment shall be rendered null and void and be vacated and

27

the Settlement Agreement and all orders entered in connection therewith shall be rendered null and

28

void.
5
[Proposed] Final Order and Judgment (Revised 150121)

Case4:12-cv-01754-JSW Document88 Filed02/03/15 Page6 of 7

1

The Parties are directed to carry out their obligations under the Settlement Agreement.

2

The Court finds as a matter of state law, that the NOI issued to the Class did not strictly

3

comply with California law, Civil Code §2983.2, and BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES is barred by

4

state law from collecting deficiency balances from the Class.

5

Consistent with IRS PLR Number 200212004, BMW FS is not required to issue 1099-Cs to

6

any class members and is not subject to the reporting requirements of Internal Revenue Code

7

section 6050P.

8
9
10

Jurisdiction is hereby reserved by this Court to assure compliance with all terms of this
Settlement, in accordance with the Settlement Agreement and this Order.
Class Counsel shall serve a copy of this Order on all named parties or their counsel within

11

seven (7) days of receipt.

12

SO ORDERED

13
14

Dated: February 6, 2015
HON.JEFFREY S. WHITE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
[Proposed] Final Order and Judgment (Revised 150121)

Case4:12-cv-01754-JSW Document88 Filed02/03/15 Page7 of 7

1
2
3

EXHIBIT 1
Class Members who timely submitted Requests for Exclusion
NONE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
[Proposed] Final Order and Judgment (Revised 150121)