Chandler v. The United States
Filing
43
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 2/28/2014 09:01 AM.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/14/2014. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2014)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
4
JO ANNE CHANDLER,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
vs.
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SANCTIONS
FOR FAILURE TO COMPLETE COMPLIANCE
RE: SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
9
10
Case No.:12- cv-1795-YGR
TO DEFENDANT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ITS COUNSEL OF RECORD,
MICHAEL G. PITMAN:
You are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why you should not be sanctioned for failure to complete
compliance with the terms of the settlement agreement reached in the settlement conference held
before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on September 13, 2013. The Court previously
continued the compliance hearing in this matter from January 24, 2014, to February 21, 2014, based
upon the representation of the United States and its counsel that it was “working on processing the
remaining payments and is hopeful that they will be released soon.” (Dkt. No. 40.) The parties have
now filed an new joint statement making the identical representation, with no further explanation for
the delay, and seeking an additional four weeks for compliance. (Dkt. No. 42.)
Counsel for Defendant and the person most knowledgeable for defendant the United States
shall appear personally on Friday, February 28, 2014, at 9:01 a.m. in Courtroom 5 prepared to
explain the lengthy delay in completing the terms of the settlement herein. If payment is completed,
in fact, prior to the hearing, the matter shall be taken off calendar and the Order to Show Cause
vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: Friday, February 14, 2014
____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?