Adams v. Vivo, Inc. et al

Filing 76

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 64 Motion for Extension of ENE Deadline.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

MARK ADAMS,

12

Plaintiff,

13

VIVO INC., et al.,

15

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO
EXTEND ENE DEADLINE

v.

14

No. C 12-01854 DMR

Defendants.
___________________________________/

16
17

On November 28, 2012, Plaintiff Mark Adams filed a motion requesting an extension of time

18

to conduct an early neutral evaluation session (“ENE”). [Docket No. 64.] Plaintiff’s motion is

19

denied as the matter is not yet ripe for decision, as the current deadline to complete the ENE is 60

20

days following Defendants’ filing of their answer, which has not yet occurred. [See Docket No. 45

21

(Case Mgmt. and Pretrial Order) 2.]

ER

H

28

M. Ryu

DONNA M. ge Donna
Jud RYU
United States Magistrate Judge

RT

27

I

NO

26

Dated: December 6, 2012

R NIA

25

ERED

ORD
T IS SO

LI

24

A

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FO

S
23

RT
U
O

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

22

UNIT
ED

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C