Adams v. Vivo, Inc. et al

Filing 76

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 64 Motion for Extension of ENE Deadline.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 MARK ADAMS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 VIVO INC., et al., 15 ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO EXTEND ENE DEADLINE v. 14 No. C 12-01854 DMR Defendants. ___________________________________/ 16 17 On November 28, 2012, Plaintiff Mark Adams filed a motion requesting an extension of time 18 to conduct an early neutral evaluation session (“ENE”). [Docket No. 64.] Plaintiff’s motion is 19 denied as the matter is not yet ripe for decision, as the current deadline to complete the ENE is 60 20 days following Defendants’ filing of their answer, which has not yet occurred. [See Docket No. 45 21 (Case Mgmt. and Pretrial Order) 2.] ER H 28 M. Ryu DONNA M. ge Donna Jud RYU United States Magistrate Judge RT 27 I NO 26 Dated: December 6, 2012 R NIA 25 ERED ORD T IS SO LI 24 A IT IS SO ORDERED. FO S 23 RT U O S DISTRICT TE C TA 22 UNIT ED For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?