Brown v. Contra Costa County et al

Filing 22

Please see document 23 for corrected OrderORDER re 21 Letter filed by Doug MacMaster, Mark Peterson, Contra Costa County, Karen Zelis-Holder. Signed by Judge 8/16/2012 on Hamilton. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2012) Modified on 8/17/2012 (vlk, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

DAVID GLENN BROWN,
Plaintiff,

8
9

v.

ORDER

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C 12-1923 PJH

Defendants.
_______________________________/

12
13

Before the court is defendants’ request for one additional day – August 22, 2012 – to

14

file their reply brief in support of their motion to dismiss. They have requested this

15

extension because they believe that plaintiff’s opposition was filed one day late, on August

16

15, 2012. The request is GRANTED, although the court wishes to note for the record that

17

the opposition was in fact filed on August 14, 2012, although it was not entered by the clerk

18

until August 15, 2012.

19

In addition, defendants are advised that based on plaintiff’s pro se status and the

20

fact that he is not presently registered as an e-filer, they are required to file certificates of

21

service showing service on plaintiff of each document they efile. The same rule applies to

22

plaintiff. To date, neither side has attached a proof of service to any document it has filed

23

with the court.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated: August 16, 2012

27
28

______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge