The Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Nothern California et al v. Victory Engineers, Inc.
Filing
16
ORDER LIFTING STAY AND SETTING FURTHER COMPLIANCE HEARING. The bankruptcy status hearing scheduled for 5/3/13 at 9:01am is VACATED. Compliance Hearing is set for 5/31/2013 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/2/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2013)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
BOARD OF TRUSTEES, in their capacities as
Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare
Trust Fund of Northern California, et al.,
8
ORDER LIFTING STAY AND SETTING
FURTHER COMPLIANCE HEARING
Plaintiffs,
9
10
Case No.: C-12-01946-YGR
vs.
VICTORY ENGINEERS, INC.,
11
Defendant.
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
Plaintiffs have filed a Case Management Statement Regarding Resolution of Defendant’s
13
14
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. (Dkt. No. 15.) In light of the Bankruptcy Court issuing Final Decree granting
15
Defendant’s discharge from Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the stay in this action is LIFTED. The bankruptcy
16
status hearing scheduled for May 3, 2013 at 9:01 a.m. is hereby VACATED.
Plaintiffs are ORDERED to provide an additional statement regarding the effect of Defendant’s
17
18
bankruptcy discharge on this action.1 If Plaintiffs’ claims were discharged in the bankruptcy, the
19
parties shall file stipulation of dismissal. If the claims were not discharged and Plaintiffs intend to
20
proceed with this action, they must provide a more detailed Case Management Statement.
A compliance hearing is scheduled for May 31, 2013 at 9:01 a.m. Five (5) business days prior
21
22
to the date of the compliance hearing, Plaintiffs must the above-referenced stipulation of dismissal or
23
Case Management Statement. If the dismissal or statement has been timely filed, no appearance will
24
be required and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be
25
26
27
28
1
The Court notes that Plaintiffs were required to immediately inform the Court when they became
“aware that the bankruptcy stay has been vacated, modified to allow this matter to proceed, or
terminated by dismissal of the bankruptcy action.” (Dkt. No. 14.) Instead, it appears that Plaintiffs
waited for over seven months to inform the Court.
1
allowed if the statement has been submitted in a timely fashion and the Court deems the hearing
2
necessary. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: May 2, 2013
_____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?