Digital Reg of Texas, LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
309
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 308 Stipulation Dismissal With Prejudice As To Defendant Zynga Inc. f/k/a Zynga Game Network, Inc. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
W. PAUL SCHUCK (Cal. Bar No. 203717)
pschuck@bztm.com
BARTKO, ZANKEL, TARRANT & MILLER
A Professional Corporation
900 Front Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 956-1900
Facsimile: (415) 956-1152
5
6
7
8
9
ANDREW G. DiNOVO (Pro Hac Vice)
adinovo@dpelaw.com
ADAM G. PRICE (Pro Hac Vice)
aprice@dpelaw.com
DiNOVO PRICE ELLWANGER & HARDY LLP
7000 N. MoPac Expressway, Suite 350
Austin, TX 78731
Telephone: (512) 539-2626
Facsimile: (512) 539-2627
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DIGITAL REG OF TEXAS, LLC
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
OAKLAND DIVISION
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
DIGITAL REG OF TEXAS, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED;
)
VALVE CORPORATION; ELECTRONIC
)
ARTS INC.; UBISOFT, INC.; SYMANTEC
)
CORPORATION, AVG TECHNOLOGIES
USA, INC.; EA GAME NETWORK INC.; EA, )
)
INC.; and INTUIT INC.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
No. 4:12-CV-01971-CW
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS
TO DEFENDANT ZYNGA INC. F/K/A
ZYNGA GAME NETWORK, INC.
23
24
25
26
27
28
2426.000/641714.1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ZYNGA INC.
F/K/A ZYNGA GAME NETWORK, INC.
Case No. 4:12-CV-01971-CW
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between plaintiff Digital
2
Reg of Texas, LLC, and defendant Zynga Inc. f/k/a Zynga Game Network, Inc., pursuant to Fed.
3
R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and subject to the approval of the Court, that all claims and counterclaims in
4
this action be, and upon approval are, dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, subject to the terms of that
5
certain agreement entitled “SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT” dated March 7, 2013, with each party
6
to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees.
7
8
Dated: March 21, 2013
BARTKO ZANKEL TARRANT & MILLER
DiNOVO PRICE ELLWANGER & HARDY LLP
9
By:
/s/ W. Paul Schuck
W. Paul Schuck
10
11
DiNOVO PRICE ELLWANGER & HARDY LLP
Andrew G. DiNovo (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Adam G. Price (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DIGITAL REG OF TEXAS, LLC
14
15
Dated: March 21, 2013
16
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP
By:
/s/ Andrew L. Chang
Andrew L. Chang
17
Attorneys for Defendant
ZYNGA INC.
f/k/a ZYNGA GAME NETWORK, INC.
18
19
20
21
22
ATTESTATION OF E-FILER
In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i), the undersigned ECF user whose identification and
23
password are being used to file this document, hereby attests that all signatories have concurred in
24
the filing of this document.
25
26
Dated: March 21, 2013
27
BARTKO ZANKEL TARRANT & MILLER
By:
28
/s/ W. Paul Schuck
W. Paul Schuck
1
2426.000/640593.1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ZYNGA INC.
F/K/A ZYNGA GAME NETWORK, INC.
Case No. 4:12-CV-01971-CW
1
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
2
CAME ON THIS DAY for consideration the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice of all
3
claims and counterclaims asserted between plaintiff Digital Reg of Texas, LLC, and defendant
4
Zynga Inc. f/k/a Zynga Game Network, Inc., in this case, and the Court being of the opinion that
5
said Stipulation should be ENTERED, it is hereby
6
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims and counterclaims asserted in
7
this suit between plaintiff Digital Reg of Texas, LLC, and defendant Zynga Inc. f/k/a Zynga Game
8
Network, Inc., are hereby dismissed with prejudice, subject to the terms of an agreement entitled
9
“SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT” and dated March 7, 2013.
10
11
It is further ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees and costs are to be borne by the party that
incurred them.
12
13
Dated:
3/22/2013
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Court Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
2426.000/640593.1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ZYNGA INC.
F/K/A ZYNGA GAME NETWORK, INC.
Case No. 4:12-CV-01971-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?