Digital Reg of Texas, LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 309

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 308 Stipulation Dismissal With Prejudice As To Defendant Zynga Inc. f/k/a Zynga Game Network, Inc. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 W. PAUL SCHUCK (Cal. Bar No. 203717) pschuck@bztm.com BARTKO, ZANKEL, TARRANT & MILLER A Professional Corporation 900 Front Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 956-1900 Facsimile: (415) 956-1152 5 6 7 8 9 ANDREW G. DiNOVO (Pro Hac Vice) adinovo@dpelaw.com ADAM G. PRICE (Pro Hac Vice) aprice@dpelaw.com DiNOVO PRICE ELLWANGER & HARDY LLP 7000 N. MoPac Expressway, Suite 350 Austin, TX 78731 Telephone: (512) 539-2626 Facsimile: (512) 539-2627 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff DIGITAL REG OF TEXAS, LLC 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 OAKLAND DIVISION 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DIGITAL REG OF TEXAS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED; ) VALVE CORPORATION; ELECTRONIC ) ARTS INC.; UBISOFT, INC.; SYMANTEC ) CORPORATION, AVG TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.; EA GAME NETWORK INC.; EA, ) ) INC.; and INTUIT INC., ) ) Defendants. ) No. 4:12-CV-01971-CW STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ZYNGA INC. F/K/A ZYNGA GAME NETWORK, INC. 23 24 25 26 27 28 2426.000/641714.1 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ZYNGA INC. F/K/A ZYNGA GAME NETWORK, INC. Case No. 4:12-CV-01971-CW 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between plaintiff Digital 2 Reg of Texas, LLC, and defendant Zynga Inc. f/k/a Zynga Game Network, Inc., pursuant to Fed. 3 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and subject to the approval of the Court, that all claims and counterclaims in 4 this action be, and upon approval are, dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, subject to the terms of that 5 certain agreement entitled “SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT” dated March 7, 2013, with each party 6 to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees. 7 8 Dated: March 21, 2013 BARTKO ZANKEL TARRANT & MILLER DiNOVO PRICE ELLWANGER & HARDY LLP 9 By: /s/ W. Paul Schuck W. Paul Schuck 10 11 DiNOVO PRICE ELLWANGER & HARDY LLP Andrew G. DiNovo (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Adam G. Price (admitted Pro Hac Vice) 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff DIGITAL REG OF TEXAS, LLC 14 15 Dated: March 21, 2013 16 SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP By: /s/ Andrew L. Chang Andrew L. Chang 17 Attorneys for Defendant ZYNGA INC. f/k/a ZYNGA GAME NETWORK, INC. 18 19 20 21 22 ATTESTATION OF E-FILER In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i), the undersigned ECF user whose identification and 23 password are being used to file this document, hereby attests that all signatories have concurred in 24 the filing of this document. 25 26 Dated: March 21, 2013 27 BARTKO ZANKEL TARRANT & MILLER By: 28 /s/ W. Paul Schuck W. Paul Schuck   1 2426.000/640593.1 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ZYNGA INC. F/K/A ZYNGA GAME NETWORK, INC. Case No. 4:12-CV-01971-CW 1 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 2 CAME ON THIS DAY for consideration the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice of all 3 claims and counterclaims asserted between plaintiff Digital Reg of Texas, LLC, and defendant 4 Zynga Inc. f/k/a Zynga Game Network, Inc., in this case, and the Court being of the opinion that 5 said Stipulation should be ENTERED, it is hereby 6 ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims and counterclaims asserted in 7 this suit between plaintiff Digital Reg of Texas, LLC, and defendant Zynga Inc. f/k/a Zynga Game 8 Network, Inc., are hereby dismissed with prejudice, subject to the terms of an agreement entitled 9 “SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT” and dated March 7, 2013. 10 11 It is further ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees and costs are to be borne by the party that incurred them. 12 13 Dated: 3/22/2013 The Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Court Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 2426.000/640593.1 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ZYNGA INC. F/K/A ZYNGA GAME NETWORK, INC. Case No. 4:12-CV-01971-CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?